Tissue factor assays as diagnostic tools for cancer? Correlation between urinary and monocyte tissue factor activity
Tissue factor assays as diagnostic tools for cancer? Correlation between urinary and monocyte tissue factor activity
 
  Monocyte and urinary tissue factors (mTF and uTF) are both elevated in a number of pathologic conditions, including cancer. This study validates the best available uTF and mTF assays as diagnostic tools for cancer and examines if uTF levels reflect monocyte activation. Using kinetic chromogenic assays for uTF and mTF (measured on fresh resting cells [baseline], unstimulated cells, and lipopolysaccharide [LPS]-stimulated cells), we assessed TF levels in normal individuals, surgical controls, and patients with benign and malignant diseases. Each benign disease group was stratified as inflammatory or noninflammatory. Controls and benign noninflammatory results were indistinguishable. The malignant and inflammatory groups showed raised uTF levels over controls (p < 0.001). mTF levels differ similarly. For mTF and uTF assays, there was no significant difference between the malignant and inflammatory groups. The relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots sensitivity against false positive rate (1-specificity) for all possible cutoff values of a diagnostic test. Assay performance is assessed as the area under the curve (AUC). The ROC curve for the uTF assay displayed both sensitivity and specificity for cancer, the AUC being 0.83. Of the three mTF levels, LPS-stimulated cells gave the optimum curve (AUC = 0.71). uTF showed a weak to moderate association with mTF levels but correlated best and was statistically significant when compared with levels in the LPS-stimulated cells. uTF represents an intrinsic, kidney-derived, physiologic concentration rather than that of preactivated or postactivated monocytes. In conclusion, both uTF and LPS-stimulated mTF levels showed sensitivity and specificity in detecting cancer and inflammatory diseases. However, the two forms of TF appear to be independently derived.
  
  
  659-68
  
    
      Lwaleed, B.A.
      
        e7c59131-82ad-4a14-a227-7370e91e3f21
      
     
  
    
      Francis, J.L.
      
        54a1f2e1-fd7a-4592-b55c-3c856810b68d
      
     
  
    
      Chisholm, M.
      
        c45aab85-a073-4041-9d3f-f7cd738aae4f
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      December 1999
    
    
  
  
    
      Lwaleed, B.A.
      
        e7c59131-82ad-4a14-a227-7370e91e3f21
      
     
  
    
      Francis, J.L.
      
        54a1f2e1-fd7a-4592-b55c-3c856810b68d
      
     
  
    
      Chisholm, M.
      
        c45aab85-a073-4041-9d3f-f7cd738aae4f
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Lwaleed, B.A., Francis, J.L. and Chisholm, M.
  
  
  
  
   
    (1999)
  
  
    
    Tissue factor assays as diagnostic tools for cancer? Correlation between urinary and monocyte tissue factor activity.
  
  
  
  
    Journal of Hematotherapy & Stem Cell Research, 8 (6), .
  
   (doi:10.1089/152581699319830). 
  
  
  
    (PMID:10645774)
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
      
        
          Abstract
          Monocyte and urinary tissue factors (mTF and uTF) are both elevated in a number of pathologic conditions, including cancer. This study validates the best available uTF and mTF assays as diagnostic tools for cancer and examines if uTF levels reflect monocyte activation. Using kinetic chromogenic assays for uTF and mTF (measured on fresh resting cells [baseline], unstimulated cells, and lipopolysaccharide [LPS]-stimulated cells), we assessed TF levels in normal individuals, surgical controls, and patients with benign and malignant diseases. Each benign disease group was stratified as inflammatory or noninflammatory. Controls and benign noninflammatory results were indistinguishable. The malignant and inflammatory groups showed raised uTF levels over controls (p < 0.001). mTF levels differ similarly. For mTF and uTF assays, there was no significant difference between the malignant and inflammatory groups. The relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots sensitivity against false positive rate (1-specificity) for all possible cutoff values of a diagnostic test. Assay performance is assessed as the area under the curve (AUC). The ROC curve for the uTF assay displayed both sensitivity and specificity for cancer, the AUC being 0.83. Of the three mTF levels, LPS-stimulated cells gave the optimum curve (AUC = 0.71). uTF showed a weak to moderate association with mTF levels but correlated best and was statistically significant when compared with levels in the LPS-stimulated cells. uTF represents an intrinsic, kidney-derived, physiologic concentration rather than that of preactivated or postactivated monocytes. In conclusion, both uTF and LPS-stimulated mTF levels showed sensitivity and specificity in detecting cancer and inflammatory diseases. However, the two forms of TF appear to be independently derived.
        
        This record has no associated files available for download.
       
    
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: December 1999
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Organisations:
        Faculty of Health Sciences
      
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 349265
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/349265
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 1525-8165
        
        
          PURE UUID: 5e0c8bc1-89bb-4866-8c39-2cc8591df9ea
        
  
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 27 Feb 2013 12:12
  Last modified: 06 Aug 2024 01:39
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              J.L. Francis
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              M. Chisholm
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics