The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of strategies to recruit older patients and carers to end-of-life research in primary care

A comparison of strategies to recruit older patients and carers to end-of-life research in primary care
A comparison of strategies to recruit older patients and carers to end-of-life research in primary care
Background: older adults receive most of their end-of-life care in the community, but there are few published data to guide researchers on recruitment to studies in primary care. The aim of this study was to compare recruitment of patients and bereaved carers from general practices in areas with different research network support, and identify challenges in obtaining samples representative of those in need of end-of-life care.

Methods: comparative analysis of recruitment from general practices to two face-to-face interview studies concerned with 1) carers’ perceptions of transitions between settings for decedents aged over 75 years and 2) the experiences of older patients living with cancer at the end-of-life.

Results: 33 (15% of invitees) patients and 118 (25%) carers were interviewed. Carers from disadvantaged areas were under-represented. Recruitment was higher when researchers, rather than research network staff, were in direct contact with general practices. Most practices recruited no more than one carer, despite a seven fold difference in the number of registered patients. The proportion identified as eligible for patient interviews varied by a factor of 38 between practices. Forty-four Primary Care Trusts granted approval to interview carers; two refused. One gave no reason; a second did not believe that general practitioners would be able to identify carers.

Conclusion: obtaining a representative sample of patients or carers in end-of-life research is a resource intensive challenge. Review of the regulatory and organisational barriers to end-of-life researchers in primary care is required. Research support networks provide invaluable assistance, but researchers should ensure that they are alert to the ways in which they may influence study recruitment
1472-6963
342
Hanratty, Barbara
b2aa3cd0-a1e2-485c-a60c-e735ffb5035d
Lowson, Elizabeth
5f1664ff-e3ad-46d1-b318-c89786a76404
Holmes, Louise
f93e1007-6a21-498e-81e0-082233b13816
Addington-Hall, Julia
87560cc4-7562-4f9b-b908-81f3b603fdd8
Arthur, Antony
90ae53fb-349a-445a-8527-a3bba857a2d7
Grande, Gunn
7335911a-ee7f-44cd-924e-c8b3c903fe6c
Payne, Sheila
d7c97f41-ec69-4157-9339-ca07c521fbcc
Seymour, Jane
b001b1f3-1ac4-495d-837f-10ca5154b5af
Hanratty, Barbara
b2aa3cd0-a1e2-485c-a60c-e735ffb5035d
Lowson, Elizabeth
5f1664ff-e3ad-46d1-b318-c89786a76404
Holmes, Louise
f93e1007-6a21-498e-81e0-082233b13816
Addington-Hall, Julia
87560cc4-7562-4f9b-b908-81f3b603fdd8
Arthur, Antony
90ae53fb-349a-445a-8527-a3bba857a2d7
Grande, Gunn
7335911a-ee7f-44cd-924e-c8b3c903fe6c
Payne, Sheila
d7c97f41-ec69-4157-9339-ca07c521fbcc
Seymour, Jane
b001b1f3-1ac4-495d-837f-10ca5154b5af

Hanratty, Barbara, Lowson, Elizabeth, Holmes, Louise, Addington-Hall, Julia, Arthur, Antony, Grande, Gunn, Payne, Sheila and Seymour, Jane (2012) A comparison of strategies to recruit older patients and carers to end-of-life research in primary care. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 342. (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-342). (PMID:23016796)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: older adults receive most of their end-of-life care in the community, but there are few published data to guide researchers on recruitment to studies in primary care. The aim of this study was to compare recruitment of patients and bereaved carers from general practices in areas with different research network support, and identify challenges in obtaining samples representative of those in need of end-of-life care.

Methods: comparative analysis of recruitment from general practices to two face-to-face interview studies concerned with 1) carers’ perceptions of transitions between settings for decedents aged over 75 years and 2) the experiences of older patients living with cancer at the end-of-life.

Results: 33 (15% of invitees) patients and 118 (25%) carers were interviewed. Carers from disadvantaged areas were under-represented. Recruitment was higher when researchers, rather than research network staff, were in direct contact with general practices. Most practices recruited no more than one carer, despite a seven fold difference in the number of registered patients. The proportion identified as eligible for patient interviews varied by a factor of 38 between practices. Forty-four Primary Care Trusts granted approval to interview carers; two refused. One gave no reason; a second did not believe that general practitioners would be able to identify carers.

Conclusion: obtaining a representative sample of patients or carers in end-of-life research is a resource intensive challenge. Review of the regulatory and organisational barriers to end-of-life researchers in primary care is required. Research support networks provide invaluable assistance, but researchers should ensure that they are alert to the ways in which they may influence study recruitment

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 27 September 2012
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 349571
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/349571
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: ef797706-283a-4f81-b72d-72a5e0f1884c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2013 11:09
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 13:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Barbara Hanratty
Author: Elizabeth Lowson
Author: Louise Holmes
Author: Antony Arthur
Author: Gunn Grande
Author: Sheila Payne
Author: Jane Seymour

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×