The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records

Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records
Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records
Background: electronic patient records are generally coded using extensive sets of codes but the significance of the utilisation of individual codes may be unclear. Item response theory (IRT) models are used to characterise the psychometric properties of items included in tests and questionnaires. This study asked whether the properties of medical codes in electronic patient records may be characterised through the application of item response theory models.

Methods: data were provided by a cohort of 47,845 participants from 414 family practices in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) with a first stroke between 1997 and 2006. Each eligible stroke code, out of a set of 202 OXMIS and Read codes, was coded as either recorded or not recorded for each participant. A two parameter IRT model was fitted using marginal maximum likelihood estimation. Estimated parameters from the model were considered to characterise each code with respect to the latent trait of stroke diagnosis. The location parameter is referred to as a calibration parameter, while the slope parameter is referred to as a discrimination parameter.

Results: there were 79,874 stroke code occurrences available for analysis. Utilisation of codes varied between family practices with intraclass correlation coefficients of up to 0.25 for the most frequently used codes. IRT analyses were restricted to 110 Read codes. Calibration and discrimination parameters were estimated for 77 (70%) codes that were endorsed for 1,942 stroke patients. Parameters were not estimated for the remaining more frequently used codes. Discrimination parameter values ranged from 0.67 to 2.78, while calibration parameters values ranged from 4.47 to 11.58. The two parameter model gave a better fit to the data than either the one- or three-parameter models. However, high chi-square values for about a fifth of the stroke codes were suggestive of poor item fit.

Conclusion: the application of item response theory models to coded electronic patient records might potentially contribute to identifying medical codes that offer poor discrimination or low calibration. This might indicate the need for improved coding sets or a requirement for improved clinical coding practice. However, in this study estimates were only obtained for a small proportion of participants and there was some evidence of poor model fit. There was also evidence of variation in the utilisation of codes between family practices raising the possibility that, in practice, properties of codes may vary for different coders
1471-2288
Dregan, A.
392a61a5-b1a1-4d41-87c3-18e3984b10b2
Grieve, A.
957dc084-75d0-425b-9c97-ac8ffbf7630e
van Staa, T.
7e263d59-ecc2-41f2-8b20-3f934d09c2c9
Gulliford, M.C.
443b6214-b206-405a-b13b-b93541e2defc
Charlton, J.
0177b4df-4db7-4de8-b4bd-143b8e3ba169
Delaney, B.
8f83ca0d-1d8e-4305-b67d-17017c925290
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Moore, M.
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Rudd, A.
4984b58f-2169-4836-8140-f08cacdbb14d
Taweel, A.
80b62335-76dd-4ee7-bc66-aabf6c80e2a3
Wolfe, C.
a3a8f950-5654-4800-8366-fba53032c900
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
eCRT Research Team
Dregan, A.
392a61a5-b1a1-4d41-87c3-18e3984b10b2
Grieve, A.
957dc084-75d0-425b-9c97-ac8ffbf7630e
van Staa, T.
7e263d59-ecc2-41f2-8b20-3f934d09c2c9
Gulliford, M.C.
443b6214-b206-405a-b13b-b93541e2defc
Charlton, J.
0177b4df-4db7-4de8-b4bd-143b8e3ba169
Delaney, B.
8f83ca0d-1d8e-4305-b67d-17017c925290
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Moore, M.
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Rudd, A.
4984b58f-2169-4836-8140-f08cacdbb14d
Taweel, A.
80b62335-76dd-4ee7-bc66-aabf6c80e2a3
Wolfe, C.
a3a8f950-5654-4800-8366-fba53032c900
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e

Dregan, A., Grieve, A., van Staa, T., Gulliford, M.C., Charlton, J., Delaney, B., Little, P., Moore, M., Rudd, A., Taweel, A., Wolfe, C. and Yardley, L. , eCRT Research Team (2011) Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11 (168). (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-168). (PMID:22176509)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: electronic patient records are generally coded using extensive sets of codes but the significance of the utilisation of individual codes may be unclear. Item response theory (IRT) models are used to characterise the psychometric properties of items included in tests and questionnaires. This study asked whether the properties of medical codes in electronic patient records may be characterised through the application of item response theory models.

Methods: data were provided by a cohort of 47,845 participants from 414 family practices in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD) with a first stroke between 1997 and 2006. Each eligible stroke code, out of a set of 202 OXMIS and Read codes, was coded as either recorded or not recorded for each participant. A two parameter IRT model was fitted using marginal maximum likelihood estimation. Estimated parameters from the model were considered to characterise each code with respect to the latent trait of stroke diagnosis. The location parameter is referred to as a calibration parameter, while the slope parameter is referred to as a discrimination parameter.

Results: there were 79,874 stroke code occurrences available for analysis. Utilisation of codes varied between family practices with intraclass correlation coefficients of up to 0.25 for the most frequently used codes. IRT analyses were restricted to 110 Read codes. Calibration and discrimination parameters were estimated for 77 (70%) codes that were endorsed for 1,942 stroke patients. Parameters were not estimated for the remaining more frequently used codes. Discrimination parameter values ranged from 0.67 to 2.78, while calibration parameters values ranged from 4.47 to 11.58. The two parameter model gave a better fit to the data than either the one- or three-parameter models. However, high chi-square values for about a fifth of the stroke codes were suggestive of poor item fit.

Conclusion: the application of item response theory models to coded electronic patient records might potentially contribute to identifying medical codes that offer poor discrimination or low calibration. This might indicate the need for improved coding sets or a requirement for improved clinical coding practice. However, in this study estimates were only obtained for a small proportion of participants and there was some evidence of poor model fit. There was also evidence of variation in the utilisation of codes between family practices raising the possibility that, in practice, properties of codes may vary for different coders

Text
1471-2288-11-168.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (218kB)

More information

Published date: 16 December 2011
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 350008
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/350008
ISSN: 1471-2288
PURE UUID: 9035e95f-ef5e-452e-87e9-44e0ddbeecd4
ORCID for M. Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509
ORCID for L. Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Mar 2013 12:56
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A. Dregan
Author: A. Grieve
Author: T. van Staa
Author: M.C. Gulliford
Author: J. Charlton
Author: B. Delaney
Author: P. Little
Author: M. Moore ORCID iD
Author: A. Rudd
Author: A. Taweel
Author: C. Wolfe
Author: L. Yardley ORCID iD
Corporate Author: eCRT Research Team

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×