A multi-country qualitative study of clinicians' and patients' views on point of care tests for lower respiratory tract infection
A multi-country qualitative study of clinicians' and patients' views on point of care tests for lower respiratory tract infection
BACKGROUND: Point of care tests (POCTs) are being promoted to better target antibiotic prescribing with the aim of improving outcomes and containing antibiotic resistance.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore clinician and patient views about POCTs to assist with the diagnosis and management of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in primary care.
METHODS: Multi-country European qualitative interview study with 80 primary care clinicians and 121 adult patients in nine primary care networks who had recently consulted with symptoms of acute cough/LRTI. Transcripts were subjected to a five-stage analytic framework approach (familiarization, developing a thematic framework from the interview questions and the themes emerging from the data, indexing, charting, and mapping to search for interpretations in the data), with local network facilitators commenting on preliminary reports.
RESULTS: Clinicians who did not routinely use POCTs for acute cough/LRTI felt that the tests' advantages included managing patient expectations for antibiotics. Perceived disadvantages included questionable test performance, problems interpreting results, a detraction from clinical reasoning, costs, time and patients not wanting, or demanding, the tests. Clinicians who routinely used POCTs echoed these disadvantages. Almost all patients would be happy to be managed with the addition of a POCT. Patients with experience of POCTs accepted it as part of routine care.
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of POCTs to clinicians is likely to be improved if tests perform well on accuracy, time to result, simplicity and cost. Including POCTs in the routine management of acute cough/LRTI is likely to be acceptable to most patients.
antibacterial agents, point of care technology, primary health care, qualitative research, respiratory tract infections
661-669
Wood, F.
4ed6fab7-a422-4029-86a1-b84e8ca377f6
Brookes-Howell, L.
14625445-131f-4864-8033-3868153839ad
Hood, K.
12e14eb3-2c75-409f-a69d-add733644d89
Cooper, L.
b36b363d-def8-4da3-b250-93dd6975e6a4
Verheij, T.
cc355b92-ba85-4102-98a0-cee55f0504f6
Goossens, H.
533640f7-b568-4d95-a7c1-28158d154ba8
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Godycki-Cwirko, M.
49c96dba-8729-4f32-8ee9-fb43f1285b8f
Adriaenssens, N.
b7618220-9c2d-45ca-9379-b962700bc676
Jakobsen, K.
03eaa2b3-18aa-4633-b71e-9711c358ac2a
Butler, C.C.
736f78ad-3e18-4c63-900f-c2249577b645
December 2011
Wood, F.
4ed6fab7-a422-4029-86a1-b84e8ca377f6
Brookes-Howell, L.
14625445-131f-4864-8033-3868153839ad
Hood, K.
12e14eb3-2c75-409f-a69d-add733644d89
Cooper, L.
b36b363d-def8-4da3-b250-93dd6975e6a4
Verheij, T.
cc355b92-ba85-4102-98a0-cee55f0504f6
Goossens, H.
533640f7-b568-4d95-a7c1-28158d154ba8
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Godycki-Cwirko, M.
49c96dba-8729-4f32-8ee9-fb43f1285b8f
Adriaenssens, N.
b7618220-9c2d-45ca-9379-b962700bc676
Jakobsen, K.
03eaa2b3-18aa-4633-b71e-9711c358ac2a
Butler, C.C.
736f78ad-3e18-4c63-900f-c2249577b645
Wood, F., Brookes-Howell, L., Hood, K., Cooper, L., Verheij, T., Goossens, H., Little, P., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Adriaenssens, N., Jakobsen, K. and Butler, C.C.
(2011)
A multi-country qualitative study of clinicians' and patients' views on point of care tests for lower respiratory tract infection.
Family Practice, 28 (6), .
(doi:10.1093/fampra/cmr031).
(PMID:21653924)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Point of care tests (POCTs) are being promoted to better target antibiotic prescribing with the aim of improving outcomes and containing antibiotic resistance.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore clinician and patient views about POCTs to assist with the diagnosis and management of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in primary care.
METHODS: Multi-country European qualitative interview study with 80 primary care clinicians and 121 adult patients in nine primary care networks who had recently consulted with symptoms of acute cough/LRTI. Transcripts were subjected to a five-stage analytic framework approach (familiarization, developing a thematic framework from the interview questions and the themes emerging from the data, indexing, charting, and mapping to search for interpretations in the data), with local network facilitators commenting on preliminary reports.
RESULTS: Clinicians who did not routinely use POCTs for acute cough/LRTI felt that the tests' advantages included managing patient expectations for antibiotics. Perceived disadvantages included questionable test performance, problems interpreting results, a detraction from clinical reasoning, costs, time and patients not wanting, or demanding, the tests. Clinicians who routinely used POCTs echoed these disadvantages. Almost all patients would be happy to be managed with the addition of a POCT. Patients with experience of POCTs accepted it as part of routine care.
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of POCTs to clinicians is likely to be improved if tests perform well on accuracy, time to result, simplicity and cost. Including POCTs in the routine management of acute cough/LRTI is likely to be acceptable to most patients.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 June 2011
Published date: December 2011
Keywords:
antibacterial agents, point of care technology, primary health care, qualitative research, respiratory tract infections
Organisations:
Primary Care & Population Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 350012
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/350012
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: ee7fb80b-1da8-46ac-bd8b-54268801ae78
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Mar 2013 16:58
Last modified: 11 Jul 2024 01:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
F. Wood
Author:
L. Brookes-Howell
Author:
K. Hood
Author:
L. Cooper
Author:
T. Verheij
Author:
H. Goossens
Author:
M. Godycki-Cwirko
Author:
N. Adriaenssens
Author:
K. Jakobsen
Author:
C.C. Butler
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics