What outcomes are important to patients with long term conditions? A discrete choice experiment
What outcomes are important to patients with long term conditions? A discrete choice experiment
Objective: To assess how much patients with long-term conditions value self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in their ability to manage their condition) compared with other health outcomes, including measures of quality of life, and process outcomes including access to General Practitioners.
Methods: Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) set in UK community settings. Participants: 367 patients (mean age 57.5) living in the community with a wide range of self-defined long-term conditions. Main outcome measures: the relative value that individuals place on four specific outcomes, namely, self-efficacy, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), access to General Practitioners, and level of isolation.
Results: Most responders completed their questionnaire in a consistent manner. Most valuations of outcomes were in the expected direction and were statistically significant. A substantial minority of responders exhibited counter-intuitive preferences. The existence of a significant constant in all models raised concerns about model misspecification. Nevertheless, all models showed that participants were willing to trade substantial reductions in their HRQoL for improvements in their self-efficacy.
Conclusions: The majority of patients with chronic conditions were able to complete the DCE questionnaires. However, the existence of counter-intuitive preferences and evidence of model misspecification require further investigation. These issues are largely overlooked in the health economics literature. Self-efficacy is an important outcome for this group and is not included explicitly in conventional HRQoL measures. This is potentially important where decisions are made on the basis of cost-effectiveness using Quality Adjusted Life Years as the metric. Exclusion of these outcomes may lead to the cost-effectiveness of these interventions being understated
discrete choice experiment, health economics, quality adjusted life-years, quality of life
331-339
Richardson, Gerry
95b61844-048d-4876-a38a-5df8b22eb0c8
Bojke, Chris
3e0d3496-1e3b-4daa-b3a1-d6fb693ac492
Kennedy, Anne
e059c1c7-d6d0-41c8-95e1-95e5273b07f8
Reeves, David
4d9f4b50-445c-4257-81fe-4d6fa73a9891
Bower, Peter
ec553157-a170-4219-8b55-2df813846e44
Lee, Victoria
49d81914-cd51-4e61-9cd1-cef1cb069d1e
Middleton, Elizabeth
732869c3-3087-464d-99bf-a35a3034d91d
Gardner, Caroline
d99612f8-f7d7-4b42-9d4b-287202c8117c
Gately, Claire
d3e553ca-d404-4c7f-b6ab-dc315e92d610
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
March 2009
Richardson, Gerry
95b61844-048d-4876-a38a-5df8b22eb0c8
Bojke, Chris
3e0d3496-1e3b-4daa-b3a1-d6fb693ac492
Kennedy, Anne
e059c1c7-d6d0-41c8-95e1-95e5273b07f8
Reeves, David
4d9f4b50-445c-4257-81fe-4d6fa73a9891
Bower, Peter
ec553157-a170-4219-8b55-2df813846e44
Lee, Victoria
49d81914-cd51-4e61-9cd1-cef1cb069d1e
Middleton, Elizabeth
732869c3-3087-464d-99bf-a35a3034d91d
Gardner, Caroline
d99612f8-f7d7-4b42-9d4b-287202c8117c
Gately, Claire
d3e553ca-d404-4c7f-b6ab-dc315e92d610
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Richardson, Gerry, Bojke, Chris, Kennedy, Anne, Reeves, David, Bower, Peter, Lee, Victoria, Middleton, Elizabeth, Gardner, Caroline, Gately, Claire and Rogers, Anne
(2009)
What outcomes are important to patients with long term conditions? A discrete choice experiment.
Value in Health, 12 (2), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00419.x).
Abstract
Objective: To assess how much patients with long-term conditions value self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in their ability to manage their condition) compared with other health outcomes, including measures of quality of life, and process outcomes including access to General Practitioners.
Methods: Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) set in UK community settings. Participants: 367 patients (mean age 57.5) living in the community with a wide range of self-defined long-term conditions. Main outcome measures: the relative value that individuals place on four specific outcomes, namely, self-efficacy, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), access to General Practitioners, and level of isolation.
Results: Most responders completed their questionnaire in a consistent manner. Most valuations of outcomes were in the expected direction and were statistically significant. A substantial minority of responders exhibited counter-intuitive preferences. The existence of a significant constant in all models raised concerns about model misspecification. Nevertheless, all models showed that participants were willing to trade substantial reductions in their HRQoL for improvements in their self-efficacy.
Conclusions: The majority of patients with chronic conditions were able to complete the DCE questionnaires. However, the existence of counter-intuitive preferences and evidence of model misspecification require further investigation. These issues are largely overlooked in the health economics literature. Self-efficacy is an important outcome for this group and is not included explicitly in conventional HRQoL measures. This is potentially important where decisions are made on the basis of cost-effectiveness using Quality Adjusted Life Years as the metric. Exclusion of these outcomes may lead to the cost-effectiveness of these interventions being understated
Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_jsb1f08_mydesktop_What Outcomes Are Important to Patients with Long Term.pdf
- Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: March 2009
Keywords:
discrete choice experiment, health economics, quality adjusted life-years, quality of life
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 350051
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/350051
ISSN: 1098-3015
PURE UUID: cc239639-bce0-4f1d-a373-2972a2a9523c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Mar 2013 11:23
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 13:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Gerry Richardson
Author:
Chris Bojke
Author:
Anne Kennedy
Author:
David Reeves
Author:
Peter Bower
Author:
Victoria Lee
Author:
Elizabeth Middleton
Author:
Caroline Gardner
Author:
Claire Gately
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics