The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Modelling sediment supply and transport in the river Lugg catchment: strategies for controlling diffuse sediment loads

Modelling sediment supply and transport in the river Lugg catchment: strategies for controlling diffuse sediment loads
Modelling sediment supply and transport in the river Lugg catchment: strategies for controlling diffuse sediment loads
The River Lugg has particular problems with high sediment loads that have resulted in detrimental impacts on ecology and fisheries. A new dynamic, process-based model of hydrology and sediments (INCA- SED) has been developed and applied to the River Lugg system using an extensive data set from 1995–2008. The model simulates sediment sources and sinks throughout the catchment and gives a good representation of the sediment response at 22 reaches along the River Lugg. A key question considered in using the model is the management of sediment sources so that concentrations and bed loads can be reduced in the river system. Altogether, five sediment management scenarios were selected for testing on the River Lugg, including land use change, contour tillage, hedging and buffer strips. Running the model with parameters altered to simulate these five scenarios produced some interesting results. All scenarios achieved some reduction in sediment levels, with the 40% land use change achieving the best result with a 19% reduction. The other scenarios also achieved significant reductions of between 7% and 9%. Buffer strips produce the best result at close to 9%. The results suggest that if hedge introduction, contour tillage and buffer strips were all applied, sediment reductions would total 24%, considerably improving the current sediment situation. We present a novel cost-effectiveness analysis of our results where we use percentage of land removed from production as our cost function. Given the minimal loss of land associated with contour tillage, hedges and buffer strips, we suggest that these management practices are the most cost-effective combination to reduce sediment loads.
Whitehead, P.G.
5dfb7549-7f3d-4e18-b99b-db00418fdd5c
Lázár, A.N.
d7f835e7-1e3d-4742-b366-af19cf5fc881
Futter, M.
d14abdac-a310-4c0f-a28e-bb798de3a32b
Pope, L.
15384231-4b71-4254-8a04-ebe453372d72
Wade, A.
dde0ab5a-d277-4178-8ae8-d086a06eaacb
Willows, R.
868c45de-2f50-4192-aba0-adbe00b21a09
Burgess, C.
a93cb977-8fd1-4327-aea0-b584c2f36fc2
Whitehead, P.G.
5dfb7549-7f3d-4e18-b99b-db00418fdd5c
Lázár, A.N.
d7f835e7-1e3d-4742-b366-af19cf5fc881
Futter, M.
d14abdac-a310-4c0f-a28e-bb798de3a32b
Pope, L.
15384231-4b71-4254-8a04-ebe453372d72
Wade, A.
dde0ab5a-d277-4178-8ae8-d086a06eaacb
Willows, R.
868c45de-2f50-4192-aba0-adbe00b21a09
Burgess, C.
a93cb977-8fd1-4327-aea0-b584c2f36fc2

Whitehead, P.G., Lázár, A.N., Futter, M., Pope, L., Wade, A., Willows, R. and Burgess, C. (2010) Modelling sediment supply and transport in the river Lugg catchment: strategies for controlling diffuse sediment loads. BHS 2010 Third International Symposium, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 19 Jun - 23 Jul 2010.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The River Lugg has particular problems with high sediment loads that have resulted in detrimental impacts on ecology and fisheries. A new dynamic, process-based model of hydrology and sediments (INCA- SED) has been developed and applied to the River Lugg system using an extensive data set from 1995–2008. The model simulates sediment sources and sinks throughout the catchment and gives a good representation of the sediment response at 22 reaches along the River Lugg. A key question considered in using the model is the management of sediment sources so that concentrations and bed loads can be reduced in the river system. Altogether, five sediment management scenarios were selected for testing on the River Lugg, including land use change, contour tillage, hedging and buffer strips. Running the model with parameters altered to simulate these five scenarios produced some interesting results. All scenarios achieved some reduction in sediment levels, with the 40% land use change achieving the best result with a 19% reduction. The other scenarios also achieved significant reductions of between 7% and 9%. Buffer strips produce the best result at close to 9%. The results suggest that if hedge introduction, contour tillage and buffer strips were all applied, sediment reductions would total 24%, considerably improving the current sediment situation. We present a novel cost-effectiveness analysis of our results where we use percentage of land removed from production as our cost function. Given the minimal loss of land associated with contour tillage, hedges and buffer strips, we suggest that these management practices are the most cost-effective combination to reduce sediment loads.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2010
Venue - Dates: BHS 2010 Third International Symposium, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 2010-06-19 - 2010-07-23
Organisations: Civil Maritime & Env. Eng & Sci Unit

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 350082
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/350082
PURE UUID: 87bd4862-9739-4283-ba8d-7c5a247bb7e1
ORCID for A.N. Lázár: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2033-2013

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Mar 2013 12:27
Last modified: 05 Mar 2024 02:46

Export record

Contributors

Author: P.G. Whitehead
Author: A.N. Lázár ORCID iD
Author: M. Futter
Author: L. Pope
Author: A. Wade
Author: R. Willows
Author: C. Burgess

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×