The timing of acquisitions
The timing of acquisitions
We analyse the timing of competitive bids. There are two buyers in our model, each of whom decide when and how much to bid for an object. These agents' valuations are commonly known, but are driven by a stochastic state variable that varies randomly over time. We assume that agent 1 (2) has the higher valuation when the state is high (low). We show first that there is delay in equilibrium: agent 1 bids only when the state is sufficiently high; and agent 2 bids only when the state is sufficiently low. This delay is not necessarily present when there is a single agent; it is present with two agents because competition makes payoffs convex. Secondly, the extent of delay increases with the degree of uncertainty (i.e., both agents wait for more extreme values of the state before bidding). Thirdly, we show that there is too much delay in equilibrium, relative to the efficient solution. Finally, we show that, in our model, the seller wishes to sell immediately, and to choose the lowest degree of uncertainty about the value of the object.
real options, timing games, auctions, acquisitions
Mason, Robin
c989f0e0-de54-495d-aeaf-75b42d62cb61
Weeds, Helen
0f3a0771-efdd-4df5-8f38-aa8e60fc7cd2
2005
Mason, Robin
c989f0e0-de54-495d-aeaf-75b42d62cb61
Weeds, Helen
0f3a0771-efdd-4df5-8f38-aa8e60fc7cd2
Mason, Robin and Weeds, Helen
(2005)
The timing of acquisitions
(Society for Economic Dynamics: 2005 Meeting Papers, 255)
New York, USA.
Mimeo
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
We analyse the timing of competitive bids. There are two buyers in our model, each of whom decide when and how much to bid for an object. These agents' valuations are commonly known, but are driven by a stochastic state variable that varies randomly over time. We assume that agent 1 (2) has the higher valuation when the state is high (low). We show first that there is delay in equilibrium: agent 1 bids only when the state is sufficiently high; and agent 2 bids only when the state is sufficiently low. This delay is not necessarily present when there is a single agent; it is present with two agents because competition makes payoffs convex. Secondly, the extent of delay increases with the degree of uncertainty (i.e., both agents wait for more extreme values of the state before bidding). Thirdly, we show that there is too much delay in equilibrium, relative to the efficient solution. Finally, we show that, in our model, the seller wishes to sell immediately, and to choose the lowest degree of uncertainty about the value of the object.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2005
Additional Information:
Presented at Society for Economic Dynamics Annual Meeting, Budapest, 23-25 Jun 2005
Keywords:
real options, timing games, auctions, acquisitions
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 35023
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35023
PURE UUID: 33c6771e-743c-47cf-ad5d-1a2f363dff3d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 May 2006
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:26
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Robin Mason
Author:
Helen Weeds
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics