Executive leadership and legislative assemblies: Latin America
Executive leadership and legislative assemblies: Latin America
Most people still think of Latin American systems as characterised by weak legislatures dominated by the executive. It is the legislatures, not the presidents, that are blamed for any shortcomings and the literature tends to focus on executive–legislative relations, to the neglect of other relevant variables such as recruitment, career patterns, committee structures, legislative processes and so on.
The cases of Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil and Venezuela all support the thesis that legislative behaviour is dependent on certain institutional conditions. Where it exists, federalism is crucial. Next to it comes the nature of the electoral system, the use of different systems for the choice of president and congress, and the staggering of executive and legislative elections. Constitutional provision for a strong presidency, especially the widespread existence and use of decree powers to override legislative ‘obstruction’, has failed in face of the electorates' opposition to the ‘Washington Consensus’.
218-229
Calvert, Peter
f6e39a14-f48b-4fdd-a8a0-1813d3a7fa63
2004
Calvert, Peter
f6e39a14-f48b-4fdd-a8a0-1813d3a7fa63
Calvert, Peter
(2004)
Executive leadership and legislative assemblies: Latin America.
Journal of Legislative Studies, 10 (2-3), .
(doi:10.1080/1357233042000322328).
Abstract
Most people still think of Latin American systems as characterised by weak legislatures dominated by the executive. It is the legislatures, not the presidents, that are blamed for any shortcomings and the literature tends to focus on executive–legislative relations, to the neglect of other relevant variables such as recruitment, career patterns, committee structures, legislative processes and so on.
The cases of Chile, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil and Venezuela all support the thesis that legislative behaviour is dependent on certain institutional conditions. Where it exists, federalism is crucial. Next to it comes the nature of the electoral system, the use of different systems for the choice of president and congress, and the staggering of executive and legislative elections. Constitutional provision for a strong presidency, especially the widespread existence and use of decree powers to override legislative ‘obstruction’, has failed in face of the electorates' opposition to the ‘Washington Consensus’.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Additional Information:
Issue: 2-3 Summer, Autumn 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 35055
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35055
ISSN: 1357-2334
PURE UUID: 5a857368-e4e1-477f-a314-c85a09139243
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:50
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Peter Calvert
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics