The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

In vitro diagnostic assays are effective during the acute phase of delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions

In vitro diagnostic assays are effective during the acute phase of delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions
In vitro diagnostic assays are effective during the acute phase of delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions
Background
Previous reports have suggested that drug-specific lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPA) can be used retrospectively to confirm the culprit drug following delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR). However, only limited evidence supports their use in aiding acute clinical management. The aim of this study was to compare the LPA against combination cytokine assays for potential use in the acute setting.

Methods
A total of 43 patients with DHR (19 during the acute reaction, 20 after recovery, four during acute and after recovery) and 14 control subjects without DHR were investigated using ex vivo analysis of drug-specific proliferation, and interferon (IFN)-? and interleukin (IL)-4 production.

Results
Healthy controls showed negative drug-specific proliferation and cytokine release in contrast to individuals with a known sensitivity (P < 0·0001). The assays demonstrated a test specificity of 95% (LPA), 83% (IFN-?) and 92% (IL-4). The sensitivity of combined measurement of drug-specific IFN-? and IL-4 cytokines during acute DHR was better than LPA (82% vs. 50%), but all assays were less sensitive during the recovery phase. The correlation between LPA and IFN-? assays was strong (r = 0·7, P < 0·0001), whereas the IL-4 assay did not correlate as well with either of these assays. In contrast to LPA, drug enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays showed positive responses in patients concurrently taking immunosuppressive medication.

Conclusions
In vitro assays of drug-specific IFN-? and IL-4 production offer potential for use as rapid diagnostic tests. Cytokine detection offers distinct advantages over the LPA, including a shorter assay time, a greater sensitivity and effectiveness in testing immunosuppressed patients.
0007-0963
539-549
Polak, M.E.
e0ac5e1a-7074-4776-ba23-490bd4da612d
Belgi, G.
17ddcd76-ce91-414d-b573-08dd4950b0d4
McGuire, C
890ed1cc-eb1a-46d5-9702-213d6aaa0b37
Pickard, C.
e21117b3-6345-4d09-a876-ac9965ec4d6a
Healy, E.
400fc04d-f81a-474a-ae25-7ff894be0ebd
Friedmann, P.S.
d50bac23-f3ec-4493-8fa0-fa126cbeba88
Ardern-Jones, M.R.
7ac43c24-94ab-4d19-ba69-afaa546bec90
Polak, M.E.
e0ac5e1a-7074-4776-ba23-490bd4da612d
Belgi, G.
17ddcd76-ce91-414d-b573-08dd4950b0d4
McGuire, C
890ed1cc-eb1a-46d5-9702-213d6aaa0b37
Pickard, C.
e21117b3-6345-4d09-a876-ac9965ec4d6a
Healy, E.
400fc04d-f81a-474a-ae25-7ff894be0ebd
Friedmann, P.S.
d50bac23-f3ec-4493-8fa0-fa126cbeba88
Ardern-Jones, M.R.
7ac43c24-94ab-4d19-ba69-afaa546bec90

Polak, M.E., Belgi, G., McGuire, C, Pickard, C., Healy, E., Friedmann, P.S. and Ardern-Jones, M.R. (2013) In vitro diagnostic assays are effective during the acute phase of delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions. British Journal of Dermatology, 168 (3), 539-549. (doi:10.1111/bjd.12109). (PMID:23106791)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Previous reports have suggested that drug-specific lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPA) can be used retrospectively to confirm the culprit drug following delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR). However, only limited evidence supports their use in aiding acute clinical management. The aim of this study was to compare the LPA against combination cytokine assays for potential use in the acute setting.

Methods
A total of 43 patients with DHR (19 during the acute reaction, 20 after recovery, four during acute and after recovery) and 14 control subjects without DHR were investigated using ex vivo analysis of drug-specific proliferation, and interferon (IFN)-? and interleukin (IL)-4 production.

Results
Healthy controls showed negative drug-specific proliferation and cytokine release in contrast to individuals with a known sensitivity (P < 0·0001). The assays demonstrated a test specificity of 95% (LPA), 83% (IFN-?) and 92% (IL-4). The sensitivity of combined measurement of drug-specific IFN-? and IL-4 cytokines during acute DHR was better than LPA (82% vs. 50%), but all assays were less sensitive during the recovery phase. The correlation between LPA and IFN-? assays was strong (r = 0·7, P < 0·0001), whereas the IL-4 assay did not correlate as well with either of these assays. In contrast to LPA, drug enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays showed positive responses in patients concurrently taking immunosuppressive medication.

Conclusions
In vitro assays of drug-specific IFN-? and IL-4 production offer potential for use as rapid diagnostic tests. Cytokine detection offers distinct advantages over the LPA, including a shorter assay time, a greater sensitivity and effectiveness in testing immunosuppressed patients.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2013
Organisations: Clinical & Experimental Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 350851
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/350851
ISSN: 0007-0963
PURE UUID: 50c510da-5c8a-4605-b7ce-2ca5c83958e2
ORCID for M.R. Ardern-Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-2016

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Apr 2013 13:53
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:28

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M.E. Polak
Author: G. Belgi
Author: C McGuire
Author: C. Pickard
Author: E. Healy
Author: P.S. Friedmann

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×