The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The use of adrenaline autoinjectors by children and teenagers

The use of adrenaline autoinjectors by children and teenagers
The use of adrenaline autoinjectors by children and teenagers
Background
Although adrenaline is recommended as first line treatment for anaphylaxis, it is often not utilized. There has been a debate about when adrenaline autoinjectors should be prescribed and how many should be dispensed.

Objectives
To see how many adrenaline autoinjectors were used during anaphylactic reactions and to determine why they were not used in situations where they were clinically indicated.

Methods
Patients were recruited prospectively at 14 paediatric allergy clinics throughout UK. Participants completed a questionnaire covering demographic data, atopic status and details of allergic reactions in the previous year and reasons for using more than one device.

Results
A total of 969 patients were recruited of whom 466 (48.1%, 95% CI: 37.9–58.2) had had at least one reaction in the previous year; 245 (25.3%, 95% CI: 16.2–34.4) of these reactions were anaphylaxis. An adrenaline autoinjector was used by 41 (16.7%, 95% CI: 11.7–21.3) participants experiencing anaphylaxis. Thirteen participants received more than one dose of adrenaline, for nine of these a health professional gave at least one. The commonest reasons for using more than one were severe breathing difficulties (40%), lack of improvement with first dose (20%) and miss-firing (13.3%). The commonest reasons for not using adrenaline in anaphylaxis were ‘thought adrenaline unnecessary’ (54.4%) and ‘unsure adrenaline necessary’ (19.1%). Many with wheeze did not use their autoinjector.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance
Adrenaline is used by only a minority of patients experiencing anaphylaxis in the community. Thirteen of the 41 patients with anaphylaxis who used their autoinjector needed another dose of adrenaline. Further research is needed to consider how to best encourage the usage of adrenaline when clinically indicated in anaphylaxis.
0954-7894
284-292
Noimark, L.
d7b81ed5-7483-4279-a578-a7e6a36d4fee
Wales, J.
47407ae5-ec4f-44fd-ac8f-860d5ff119a4
Du Toit, G.
bd3ee72d-f4fa-4e4f-bf73-f0a0678ca7b0
Pastacaldi, C.
fb37082e-ed03-4cca-a33b-bb1984224e88
Haddad, D.
cc9b0b58-d1f3-4eea-adab-e2b015bb3dd5
Gardner, J.
bfe7b66f-4a4a-4ca2-857b-99ab7e5b9cdb
Hyer, W.
581fd20d-8fcb-4f64-9999-d9b323ba4e48
Vance, G.
543b3812-2b0d-4b39-ad67-6c5519956f5b
Townshend, C.
52bc2e90-c0d2-497b-be2f-7c93a0aa8e15
Alfaham, M.
dab01a88-a262-4d7a-a76a-2e83ea6d24f0
Arkwright, P.D.
2f0a0a79-59b8-4340-804f-119428edc501
Rao, R.
4ae17f09-eff7-4ee2-81a7-7969556ae5e2
Kapoor, S.
353368ca-78b5-4094-b718-c5738c60050e
Summerfield, A.
e7b8e74b-021c-4630-92f5-9754d199b858
Warner, J.O.
c232f1e5-62eb-46e6-8b0c-4836b45b36a5
Roberts, Graham
ea00db4e-84e7-4b39-8273-9b71dbd7e2f3
Noimark, L.
d7b81ed5-7483-4279-a578-a7e6a36d4fee
Wales, J.
47407ae5-ec4f-44fd-ac8f-860d5ff119a4
Du Toit, G.
bd3ee72d-f4fa-4e4f-bf73-f0a0678ca7b0
Pastacaldi, C.
fb37082e-ed03-4cca-a33b-bb1984224e88
Haddad, D.
cc9b0b58-d1f3-4eea-adab-e2b015bb3dd5
Gardner, J.
bfe7b66f-4a4a-4ca2-857b-99ab7e5b9cdb
Hyer, W.
581fd20d-8fcb-4f64-9999-d9b323ba4e48
Vance, G.
543b3812-2b0d-4b39-ad67-6c5519956f5b
Townshend, C.
52bc2e90-c0d2-497b-be2f-7c93a0aa8e15
Alfaham, M.
dab01a88-a262-4d7a-a76a-2e83ea6d24f0
Arkwright, P.D.
2f0a0a79-59b8-4340-804f-119428edc501
Rao, R.
4ae17f09-eff7-4ee2-81a7-7969556ae5e2
Kapoor, S.
353368ca-78b5-4094-b718-c5738c60050e
Summerfield, A.
e7b8e74b-021c-4630-92f5-9754d199b858
Warner, J.O.
c232f1e5-62eb-46e6-8b0c-4836b45b36a5
Roberts, Graham
ea00db4e-84e7-4b39-8273-9b71dbd7e2f3

Noimark, L., Wales, J., Du Toit, G., Pastacaldi, C., Haddad, D., Gardner, J., Hyer, W., Vance, G., Townshend, C., Alfaham, M., Arkwright, P.D., Rao, R., Kapoor, S., Summerfield, A., Warner, J.O. and Roberts, Graham (2012) The use of adrenaline autoinjectors by children and teenagers. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 42 (2), 284-292. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03912.x). (PMID:22181034)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Although adrenaline is recommended as first line treatment for anaphylaxis, it is often not utilized. There has been a debate about when adrenaline autoinjectors should be prescribed and how many should be dispensed.

Objectives
To see how many adrenaline autoinjectors were used during anaphylactic reactions and to determine why they were not used in situations where they were clinically indicated.

Methods
Patients were recruited prospectively at 14 paediatric allergy clinics throughout UK. Participants completed a questionnaire covering demographic data, atopic status and details of allergic reactions in the previous year and reasons for using more than one device.

Results
A total of 969 patients were recruited of whom 466 (48.1%, 95% CI: 37.9–58.2) had had at least one reaction in the previous year; 245 (25.3%, 95% CI: 16.2–34.4) of these reactions were anaphylaxis. An adrenaline autoinjector was used by 41 (16.7%, 95% CI: 11.7–21.3) participants experiencing anaphylaxis. Thirteen participants received more than one dose of adrenaline, for nine of these a health professional gave at least one. The commonest reasons for using more than one were severe breathing difficulties (40%), lack of improvement with first dose (20%) and miss-firing (13.3%). The commonest reasons for not using adrenaline in anaphylaxis were ‘thought adrenaline unnecessary’ (54.4%) and ‘unsure adrenaline necessary’ (19.1%). Many with wheeze did not use their autoinjector.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance
Adrenaline is used by only a minority of patients experiencing anaphylaxis in the community. Thirteen of the 41 patients with anaphylaxis who used their autoinjector needed another dose of adrenaline. Further research is needed to consider how to best encourage the usage of adrenaline when clinically indicated in anaphylaxis.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 19 December 2011
Published date: February 2012
Organisations: Human Development & Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 351126
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/351126
ISSN: 0954-7894
PURE UUID: 9d1cd6aa-0a3e-44ab-ad84-74f899c74cfe
ORCID for Graham Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-1248

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Apr 2013 15:09
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. Noimark
Author: J. Wales
Author: G. Du Toit
Author: C. Pastacaldi
Author: D. Haddad
Author: J. Gardner
Author: W. Hyer
Author: G. Vance
Author: C. Townshend
Author: M. Alfaham
Author: P.D. Arkwright
Author: R. Rao
Author: S. Kapoor
Author: A. Summerfield
Author: J.O. Warner
Author: Graham Roberts ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×