The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer

Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer
Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer
Introduction: Intra-operative sentinel node analysis (IOA) for breast cancer reduces the need for a second operation by revealing metastasis intra-operatively, allowing immediate axillary clearance. Critics argue that the number of patients deriving benefit is limited, as further surgery is often required for reasons other than nodal status.

Aim: To identify the proportion of women avoiding further surgery by using IOA excluding those who require further surgery for reasons other than axillary node metastasis.

Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy with IOA over one year were reviewed. Patient demographics, margin positivity, sentinel node metastasis, requirement for further surgery, and cavity shave involvement were analysed.

Results: 322 patients were analysed: 253 undergoing breast-conserving surgery [BCS] and 69 undergoing mastectomy). IOA revealed metastasis in 81 (25.2.%) patients [25 undergoing mastectomy and 56 undergoing BCS], who underwent immediate axillary clearance. 43 BCS patients (17%) did not require further surgery other than for sentinel node involvement. 39 patients required further oncological surgery: 16 excision of margins; 13 completion mastectomy; 6 excision of margins followed by mastectomy; 3 completion axillary clearance; and 1 excision of recurrence. 20.6% had involvement of any circumferential histological margin. Cavity shaves were performed in 28.5% patients at initial surgery, the majority of which were clear of malignancy. 20 mastectomy patients had concordant definitive histology, avoiding a second operation. In total, 19.6% of this cohort avoided a second operation through the use of IOA.

Discussion: Approximately 15% of patients undergoing breast conservation surgery for breast cancer require further surgery. However, a further 17% were saved subsequent surgery by utilising IOA, since they had immediate axillary clearance. When also considering patients undergoing mastectomy, this proportion is even higher.
breast-conserving surgery, breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymph node dissection, reoperation
1479-666X
Dabbas, N.
cfdce3af-8b5f-4e96-b476-0c251275a1d0
Cutress, R.I.
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Wise, M.
4c9966cc-c274-4677-8905-abbd35066e55
Agrawal, A.
6f9fe130-fc73-4d92-8052-967879ae7810
Dabbas, N.
cfdce3af-8b5f-4e96-b476-0c251275a1d0
Cutress, R.I.
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Wise, M.
4c9966cc-c274-4677-8905-abbd35066e55
Agrawal, A.
6f9fe130-fc73-4d92-8052-967879ae7810

Dabbas, N., Cutress, R.I., Wise, M. and Agrawal, A. (2013) Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer. The Surgeon. (doi:10.1016/j.surge.2012.12.008). (PMID:23453370)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: Intra-operative sentinel node analysis (IOA) for breast cancer reduces the need for a second operation by revealing metastasis intra-operatively, allowing immediate axillary clearance. Critics argue that the number of patients deriving benefit is limited, as further surgery is often required for reasons other than nodal status.

Aim: To identify the proportion of women avoiding further surgery by using IOA excluding those who require further surgery for reasons other than axillary node metastasis.

Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy with IOA over one year were reviewed. Patient demographics, margin positivity, sentinel node metastasis, requirement for further surgery, and cavity shave involvement were analysed.

Results: 322 patients were analysed: 253 undergoing breast-conserving surgery [BCS] and 69 undergoing mastectomy). IOA revealed metastasis in 81 (25.2.%) patients [25 undergoing mastectomy and 56 undergoing BCS], who underwent immediate axillary clearance. 43 BCS patients (17%) did not require further surgery other than for sentinel node involvement. 39 patients required further oncological surgery: 16 excision of margins; 13 completion mastectomy; 6 excision of margins followed by mastectomy; 3 completion axillary clearance; and 1 excision of recurrence. 20.6% had involvement of any circumferential histological margin. Cavity shaves were performed in 28.5% patients at initial surgery, the majority of which were clear of malignancy. 20 mastectomy patients had concordant definitive histology, avoiding a second operation. In total, 19.6% of this cohort avoided a second operation through the use of IOA.

Discussion: Approximately 15% of patients undergoing breast conservation surgery for breast cancer require further surgery. However, a further 17% were saved subsequent surgery by utilising IOA, since they had immediate axillary clearance. When also considering patients undergoing mastectomy, this proportion is even higher.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 28 February 2013
Keywords: breast-conserving surgery, breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymph node dissection, reoperation
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 351220
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/351220
ISSN: 1479-666X
PURE UUID: 90babca5-f911-42b8-9aed-79d1b4df3b11

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Apr 2013 12:36
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 13:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: N. Dabbas
Author: R.I. Cutress
Author: M. Wise
Author: A. Agrawal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×