The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Nutritional supplements and other complementary medicines for infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Nutritional supplements and other complementary medicines for infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
Nutritional supplements and other complementary medicines for infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicines often are advocated for infantile colic, yet there has been no synthesis of the evidence to inform current practice about their use.

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate all randomized clinical trials of nutritional supplements and other complementary and alternative medicines as a treatment for infantile colic.

METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched from their inception to February 2010 to identify all relevant randomized clinical trials of complementary and alternative medicines and supplements for infantile colic. Reference lists of retrieved articles were hand searched. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, and methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad score and key aspects of the Cochrane risk of bias.

RESULTS: Fifteen randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included. Thirteen studies were placebo controlled. Eight were of good methodological quality. Eleven trials indicated a significant result in favor of complementary and alternative medicines. However, none of these randomized clinical trials were without flaws. Independent replications were missing for most modalities.

CONCLUSIONS: Some encouraging results exist for fennel extract, mixed herbal tea, and sugar solutions, although it has to be stressed that all trials have major limitations. Thus, the notion that any form of complementary and alternative medicine is effective for infantile colic currently is not supported from the evidence from the included randomized clinical trials. Additional replications are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.
0031-4005
720-733
Perry, R.
40cdf881-b9da-4bac-a76a-89c6fcf156a5
Hunt, Katherine J.
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Ernst, E.
3978447d-2318-4c4f-81bd-84fa8e25dbdc
Perry, R.
40cdf881-b9da-4bac-a76a-89c6fcf156a5
Hunt, Katherine J.
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Ernst, E.
3978447d-2318-4c4f-81bd-84fa8e25dbdc

Perry, R., Hunt, Katherine J. and Ernst, E. (2011) Nutritional supplements and other complementary medicines for infantile colic: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Pediatrics, 127 (4), 720-733. (doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2098). (PMID:21444591)

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicines often are advocated for infantile colic, yet there has been no synthesis of the evidence to inform current practice about their use.

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate all randomized clinical trials of nutritional supplements and other complementary and alternative medicines as a treatment for infantile colic.

METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched from their inception to February 2010 to identify all relevant randomized clinical trials of complementary and alternative medicines and supplements for infantile colic. Reference lists of retrieved articles were hand searched. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers, and methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad score and key aspects of the Cochrane risk of bias.

RESULTS: Fifteen randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included. Thirteen studies were placebo controlled. Eight were of good methodological quality. Eleven trials indicated a significant result in favor of complementary and alternative medicines. However, none of these randomized clinical trials were without flaws. Independent replications were missing for most modalities.

CONCLUSIONS: Some encouraging results exist for fennel extract, mixed herbal tea, and sugar solutions, although it has to be stressed that all trials have major limitations. Thus, the notion that any form of complementary and alternative medicine is effective for infantile colic currently is not supported from the evidence from the included randomized clinical trials. Additional replications are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 28 March 2011
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 351320
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/351320
ISSN: 0031-4005
PURE UUID: ae8422c1-5ba5-4c8f-89c4-842c58535be5
ORCID for Katherine J. Hunt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7319

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Apr 2013 10:51
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R. Perry
Author: E. Ernst

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×