The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Results of annual screening in phase I of the United Kingdom familial ovarian cancer screening study highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule

Results of annual screening in phase I of the United Kingdom familial ovarian cancer screening study highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule
Results of annual screening in phase I of the United Kingdom familial ovarian cancer screening study highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule
Purpose: To establish the performance characteristics of annual transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 screening for women at high risk of ovarian/fallopian tube cancer (OC/FTC) and to investigate the impact of delayed screening interval and surgical intervention.

Patients and methods: Between May 6, 2002, and January 5, 2008, 3,563 women at an estimated ? 10% lifetime risk of OC/FTC were recruited and screened by 37 centers in the United Kingdom. Participants were observed prospectively by centers, questionnaire, and national cancer registries.

Results: Sensitivity for detection of incident OC/FTC at 1 year after last annual screen was 81.3% (95% CI, 54.3% to 96.0%) if occult cancers were classified as false negatives and 87.5% (95% CI, 61.7% to 98.5%) if they were classified as true positives. Positive and negative predictive values of incident screening were 25.5% (95% CI, 14.3 to 40.0) and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8 to 100) respectively. Four (30.8%) of 13 incident screen-detected OC/FTCs were stage I or II. Compared with women screened in the year before diagnosis, those not screened in the year before diagnosis were more likely to have ? stage IIIc disease (85.7% v 26.1%; P = .009). Screening interval was delayed by a median of 88 days before detection of incident OC/FTC. Median interval from detection screen to surgical intervention was 79 days in prevalent and incident OC/FTC.

Conclusion: These results in the high-risk population highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule. Screening more frequently than annually with prompt surgical intervention seems to offer a better chance of early-stage detection.
1527-7755
49-57
Rosenthal, Adam N.
3ae709e3-f93a-4d9d-b5f1-ff17017e9690
Fraser, Lindsay
c2933103-cec3-4e09-ab33-121b4a51a6fb
Manchanda, Ranjit
fcf99156-4522-406c-a935-f9885efb224c
Badman, Philip
3fd85f35-9612-447e-8193-3d4ff25c197b
Philpott, Susan
99983e33-ae01-4cd0-9b4a-36b6509e5a62
Mozersky, Jessica
d8eda07b-3fdd-4191-bc37-2f32cadb90f7
Hadwin, Richard
046f8946-270c-4a32-8184-54ac13cb3e41
Cafferty, Fay H.
d03118b8-0eec-4fb5-b9da-6f6c0a168f04
Benjamin, Elizabeth
dcf412f7-34bc-4071-96dc-ecdea58e3db1
Singh, Naveena
9309e5e9-e2be-42b7-a586-951019635479
Evans, D. Gareth
314acefb-89fb-4eb7-a0e7-0a6949c9af6c
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Skates, Steven J.
d5f583ab-5c46-496e-80e6-8645be40ad92
Mackay, James
561a286b-9d0c-4f1c-aa7c-c64eceb02fb1
Menon, Usha
f0dd65de-11d4-489a-a468-9589bbe43969
Jacobs, Ian J.
5c66481b-e655-47ca-b40b-6e9d89728ca7
Rosenthal, Adam N.
3ae709e3-f93a-4d9d-b5f1-ff17017e9690
Fraser, Lindsay
c2933103-cec3-4e09-ab33-121b4a51a6fb
Manchanda, Ranjit
fcf99156-4522-406c-a935-f9885efb224c
Badman, Philip
3fd85f35-9612-447e-8193-3d4ff25c197b
Philpott, Susan
99983e33-ae01-4cd0-9b4a-36b6509e5a62
Mozersky, Jessica
d8eda07b-3fdd-4191-bc37-2f32cadb90f7
Hadwin, Richard
046f8946-270c-4a32-8184-54ac13cb3e41
Cafferty, Fay H.
d03118b8-0eec-4fb5-b9da-6f6c0a168f04
Benjamin, Elizabeth
dcf412f7-34bc-4071-96dc-ecdea58e3db1
Singh, Naveena
9309e5e9-e2be-42b7-a586-951019635479
Evans, D. Gareth
314acefb-89fb-4eb7-a0e7-0a6949c9af6c
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Skates, Steven J.
d5f583ab-5c46-496e-80e6-8645be40ad92
Mackay, James
561a286b-9d0c-4f1c-aa7c-c64eceb02fb1
Menon, Usha
f0dd65de-11d4-489a-a468-9589bbe43969
Jacobs, Ian J.
5c66481b-e655-47ca-b40b-6e9d89728ca7

Rosenthal, Adam N., Fraser, Lindsay, Manchanda, Ranjit, Badman, Philip, Philpott, Susan, Mozersky, Jessica, Hadwin, Richard, Cafferty, Fay H., Benjamin, Elizabeth, Singh, Naveena, Evans, D. Gareth, Eccles, Diana M., Skates, Steven J., Mackay, James, Menon, Usha and Jacobs, Ian J. (2013) Results of annual screening in phase I of the United Kingdom familial ovarian cancer screening study highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31 (1), 49-57. (doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7638). (PMID:23213100)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: To establish the performance characteristics of annual transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA125 screening for women at high risk of ovarian/fallopian tube cancer (OC/FTC) and to investigate the impact of delayed screening interval and surgical intervention.

Patients and methods: Between May 6, 2002, and January 5, 2008, 3,563 women at an estimated ? 10% lifetime risk of OC/FTC were recruited and screened by 37 centers in the United Kingdom. Participants were observed prospectively by centers, questionnaire, and national cancer registries.

Results: Sensitivity for detection of incident OC/FTC at 1 year after last annual screen was 81.3% (95% CI, 54.3% to 96.0%) if occult cancers were classified as false negatives and 87.5% (95% CI, 61.7% to 98.5%) if they were classified as true positives. Positive and negative predictive values of incident screening were 25.5% (95% CI, 14.3 to 40.0) and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.8 to 100) respectively. Four (30.8%) of 13 incident screen-detected OC/FTCs were stage I or II. Compared with women screened in the year before diagnosis, those not screened in the year before diagnosis were more likely to have ? stage IIIc disease (85.7% v 26.1%; P = .009). Screening interval was delayed by a median of 88 days before detection of incident OC/FTC. Median interval from detection screen to surgical intervention was 79 days in prevalent and incident OC/FTC.

Conclusion: These results in the high-risk population highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule. Screening more frequently than annually with prompt surgical intervention seems to offer a better chance of early-stage detection.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 3 December 2012
Published date: 1 January 2013
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 352343
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/352343
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: b3914833-823c-4617-92d6-c5dd8b7d90cb
ORCID for Diana M. Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 May 2013 12:05
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adam N. Rosenthal
Author: Lindsay Fraser
Author: Ranjit Manchanda
Author: Philip Badman
Author: Susan Philpott
Author: Jessica Mozersky
Author: Richard Hadwin
Author: Fay H. Cafferty
Author: Elizabeth Benjamin
Author: Naveena Singh
Author: D. Gareth Evans
Author: Diana M. Eccles ORCID iD
Author: Steven J. Skates
Author: James Mackay
Author: Usha Menon
Author: Ian J. Jacobs

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×