Self-focus and procedural fairness: the role of self-rumination and self-reflection
Self-focus and procedural fairness: the role of self-rumination and self-reflection
This article examined the differential role of self-rumination and self-reflection on the psychological influence of procedural fairness. Study 1 induced self-rumination and self-reflection relative to an outward-focused control. Self-rumination increased the perceived importance of procedural fairness, whereas self-reflection decreased it. Study 2, assessing individual differences in self-rumination and self-reflection, showed that a standard procedural fairness manipulation (voice vs. no voice) predicted future interaction preferences with the enactment source among those high (but not low) in self-rumination and among those low (but not high) in self-reflection. The findings validate a multiple process approach to understanding the role of the self in procedural fairness.
procedural fairness, self, self-focus, self-rumination, self-reflection
151-167
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
Cremer, David
4b543089-87e7-4f1d-8c25-5519f2a4e13f
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Van Hiel, Alain
9b4478e7-9679-47bc-862f-2907820443d0
June 2013
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
Cremer, David
4b543089-87e7-4f1d-8c25-5519f2a4e13f
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Van Hiel, Alain
9b4478e7-9679-47bc-862f-2907820443d0
Brebels, Lieven, Cremer, David, Sedikides, Constantine and Van Hiel, Alain
(2013)
Self-focus and procedural fairness: the role of self-rumination and self-reflection.
Social Justice Research, 26 (2), .
(doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0180-4).
Abstract
This article examined the differential role of self-rumination and self-reflection on the psychological influence of procedural fairness. Study 1 induced self-rumination and self-reflection relative to an outward-focused control. Self-rumination increased the perceived importance of procedural fairness, whereas self-reflection decreased it. Study 2, assessing individual differences in self-rumination and self-reflection, showed that a standard procedural fairness manipulation (voice vs. no voice) predicted future interaction preferences with the enactment source among those high (but not low) in self-rumination and among those low (but not high) in self-reflection. The findings validate a multiple process approach to understanding the role of the self in procedural fairness.
Text
Brebels DeCremer Sedikides Van Hiel_2013 Social Justice Research.doc
- Author's Original
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 March 2013
Published date: June 2013
Keywords:
procedural fairness, self, self-focus, self-rumination, self-reflection
Organisations:
Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 353016
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/353016
PURE UUID: c36cc2ce-4ec7-4dc6-a128-2fe534cf498b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 May 2013 11:46
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lieven Brebels
Author:
David Cremer
Author:
Alain Van Hiel
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics