The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Self-focus and procedural fairness: the role of self-rumination and self-reflection

Self-focus and procedural fairness: the role of self-rumination and self-reflection
Self-focus and procedural fairness: the role of self-rumination and self-reflection
This article examined the differential role of self-rumination and self-reflection on the psychological influence of procedural fairness. Study 1 induced self-rumination and self-reflection relative to an outward-focused control. Self-rumination increased the perceived importance of procedural fairness, whereas self-reflection decreased it. Study 2, assessing individual differences in self-rumination and self-reflection, showed that a standard procedural fairness manipulation (voice vs. no voice) predicted future interaction preferences with the enactment source among those high (but not low) in self-rumination and among those low (but not high) in self-reflection. The findings validate a multiple process approach to understanding the role of the self in procedural fairness.
procedural fairness, self, self-focus, self-rumination, self-reflection
151-167
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
Cremer, David
4b543089-87e7-4f1d-8c25-5519f2a4e13f
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Van Hiel, Alain
9b4478e7-9679-47bc-862f-2907820443d0
Brebels, Lieven
f36eadc9-7569-4ba5-80f7-1490cf153442
Cremer, David
4b543089-87e7-4f1d-8c25-5519f2a4e13f
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Van Hiel, Alain
9b4478e7-9679-47bc-862f-2907820443d0

Brebels, Lieven, Cremer, David, Sedikides, Constantine and Van Hiel, Alain (2013) Self-focus and procedural fairness: the role of self-rumination and self-reflection. Social Justice Research, 26 (2), 151-167. (doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0180-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article examined the differential role of self-rumination and self-reflection on the psychological influence of procedural fairness. Study 1 induced self-rumination and self-reflection relative to an outward-focused control. Self-rumination increased the perceived importance of procedural fairness, whereas self-reflection decreased it. Study 2, assessing individual differences in self-rumination and self-reflection, showed that a standard procedural fairness manipulation (voice vs. no voice) predicted future interaction preferences with the enactment source among those high (but not low) in self-rumination and among those low (but not high) in self-reflection. The findings validate a multiple process approach to understanding the role of the self in procedural fairness.

Text
Brebels DeCremer Sedikides Van Hiel_2013 Social Justice Research.doc - Author's Original
Download (225kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 13 March 2013
Published date: June 2013
Keywords: procedural fairness, self, self-focus, self-rumination, self-reflection
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 353016
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/353016
PURE UUID: c36cc2ce-4ec7-4dc6-a128-2fe534cf498b
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 May 2013 11:46
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lieven Brebels
Author: David Cremer
Author: Alain Van Hiel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×