Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements
Disease-related malnutrition is common, detrimentally affecting the patient and healthcare economy. Although use of high protein oral nutritional supplements (ONS) has been recommended to counteract the catabolic effects of disease and to facilitate recovery from illness, there is a lack of systematically obtained evidence to support these recommendations. This systematic review involving 36 randomised controlled trials (RCT) (n=3790) (mean age 74 years; 83% of trials in patients >65 years) and a series of meta-analyses of high protein ONS (>20% energy from protein) demonstrated a range of effects across settings and patient groups in favour of the high protein ONS group. These included reduced complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.68 (95%CI 0.55-0.83), p<0.001, 10 RCT, n=1830); reduced readmissions to hospital (OR 0.59 (95%CI 0.41-0.84), p=0.004, 2 RCT, n=546); improved grip strength (1.76 kg (95%CI 0.36-3.17), p<0.014, 4 RCT, n=219); increased intake of protein (p<0.001) and energy (p<0.001) with little reduction in normal food intake and improvements in weight (p<0.001). There was inadequate information to compare standard ONS (<20% energy from protein) with high protein ONS (>20% energy from protein). The systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that high protein supplements produce clinical benefits, with economic implications.
278-296
Cawood, A.L.
cb49a0db-083f-4ce9-818c-8b95238b2bd0
Elia, M.
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Stratton, RJ
594918af-c128-4cfc-8446-5876ebd9a4d9
2012
Cawood, A.L.
cb49a0db-083f-4ce9-818c-8b95238b2bd0
Elia, M.
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Stratton, RJ
594918af-c128-4cfc-8446-5876ebd9a4d9
Cawood, A.L., Elia, M. and Stratton, RJ
(2012)
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements.
Ageing Research Reviews, 11 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.008,).
(PMID:22212388)
Abstract
Disease-related malnutrition is common, detrimentally affecting the patient and healthcare economy. Although use of high protein oral nutritional supplements (ONS) has been recommended to counteract the catabolic effects of disease and to facilitate recovery from illness, there is a lack of systematically obtained evidence to support these recommendations. This systematic review involving 36 randomised controlled trials (RCT) (n=3790) (mean age 74 years; 83% of trials in patients >65 years) and a series of meta-analyses of high protein ONS (>20% energy from protein) demonstrated a range of effects across settings and patient groups in favour of the high protein ONS group. These included reduced complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.68 (95%CI 0.55-0.83), p<0.001, 10 RCT, n=1830); reduced readmissions to hospital (OR 0.59 (95%CI 0.41-0.84), p=0.004, 2 RCT, n=546); improved grip strength (1.76 kg (95%CI 0.36-3.17), p<0.014, 4 RCT, n=219); increased intake of protein (p<0.001) and energy (p<0.001) with little reduction in normal food intake and improvements in weight (p<0.001). There was inadequate information to compare standard ONS (<20% energy from protein) with high protein ONS (>20% energy from protein). The systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that high protein supplements produce clinical benefits, with economic implications.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2012
Organisations:
Faculty of Medicine
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 353237
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/353237
ISSN: 1568-1637
PURE UUID: b8a054f4-a868-4568-9e79-92077f3b8532
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jun 2013 11:19
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.L. Cawood
Author:
RJ Stratton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics