The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Netherlands; an 'Echternach' procession in different directions: oscillating steps towards reform

Netherlands; an 'Echternach' procession in different directions: oscillating steps towards reform
Netherlands; an 'Echternach' procession in different directions: oscillating steps towards reform
The annual procession in the Luxemburg town of Echternach is famous for its laborious manner of reaching its end: two steps forward, one step back. In this paper, we will maintain that the policy of the Dutch government over the period of c.1982–2007 resembles an Echternach procession in reverse: every time it took two steps back from control over higher education, it took one step ahead again. It was not a random oscillation between the two extremes NPM and NG, but the trend certainly was not linear either. We address policy developments in Dutch higher education and research in the last two and a half decades in order to explore shifts in governance of universities. Our aim is to elaborate upon the consequences of such shifts on doctoral training and on research funding for universities, for which extensive treatment of the general reforms in higher education and research are necessary. Based on the two concepts of NPM and NG, and as a result of the Echternach-like movements from one policy paper to the next regulation or the following instrument mix, concrete societal sub-systems or policy fields can now be understood as mixtures of the two.

In turning to the governance of university systems, we make use of already existing typologies of basic dimensions of the modes of coordination of this societal sub-sector. In the following, and in more detail than the two main ideal types that structure this book, we distinguish five modes of co-ordination: state regulation, stakeholder guidance, academic self-governance, managerial self-governance, and competition.
978-1-4020-8637-3
25
103-125
Springer
Westerheijden, Don
86c473af-e988-4b17-9323-5fdcbd64da5c
de Boer, Harry
5d57956c-8ae8-4ddf-9442-997bd3870a3c
Enders, Jürgen
cf0b34e3-15ef-430a-ae38-3c780d059a78
Paradeise, C.
Reale, E.
Bleiklie, I.
Ferlie, E.
Westerheijden, Don
86c473af-e988-4b17-9323-5fdcbd64da5c
de Boer, Harry
5d57956c-8ae8-4ddf-9442-997bd3870a3c
Enders, Jürgen
cf0b34e3-15ef-430a-ae38-3c780d059a78
Paradeise, C.
Reale, E.
Bleiklie, I.
Ferlie, E.

Westerheijden, Don, de Boer, Harry and Enders, Jürgen (2009) Netherlands; an 'Echternach' procession in different directions: oscillating steps towards reform. In, Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I. and Ferlie, E. (eds.) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives. (Higher Education Dynamics, 25) Dordrecht, NL. Springer, pp. 103-125. (doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9515-3_5).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

The annual procession in the Luxemburg town of Echternach is famous for its laborious manner of reaching its end: two steps forward, one step back. In this paper, we will maintain that the policy of the Dutch government over the period of c.1982–2007 resembles an Echternach procession in reverse: every time it took two steps back from control over higher education, it took one step ahead again. It was not a random oscillation between the two extremes NPM and NG, but the trend certainly was not linear either. We address policy developments in Dutch higher education and research in the last two and a half decades in order to explore shifts in governance of universities. Our aim is to elaborate upon the consequences of such shifts on doctoral training and on research funding for universities, for which extensive treatment of the general reforms in higher education and research are necessary. Based on the two concepts of NPM and NG, and as a result of the Echternach-like movements from one policy paper to the next regulation or the following instrument mix, concrete societal sub-systems or policy fields can now be understood as mixtures of the two.

In turning to the governance of university systems, we make use of already existing typologies of basic dimensions of the modes of coordination of this societal sub-sector. In the following, and in more detail than the two main ideal types that structure this book, we distinguish five modes of co-ordination: state regulation, stakeholder guidance, academic self-governance, managerial self-governance, and competition.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2009
Organisations: Southampton Education School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 353437
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/353437
ISBN: 978-1-4020-8637-3
PURE UUID: ab3dfeb6-d073-44e8-bac3-99a6ab85fe59

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jun 2013 11:38
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Don Westerheijden
Author: Harry de Boer
Author: Jürgen Enders
Editor: C. Paradeise
Editor: E. Reale
Editor: I. Bleiklie
Editor: E. Ferlie

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×