L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity in English by Spanish and Slavic native speakers
L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity in English by Spanish and Slavic native speakers
This paper investigates the claim that the native grammar of the learners is the initial state of second-language acquisition, as far as the acquisition of universal grammar parameters is concerned. Two opposing views on L1 transfer are discussed: the first hypothesis maintains that learners start outwith the L1 parameter value (Schwartz and Sprouse’s 1994, 1996 full-transfer/full-access hypothesis), while the second hypothesis argues that L1 transfer plays a minimal role in the acquisition process (Epstein et al.1996’s no-transfer/full-access hypothesis). The parameter under investigation is the aspect parameter, postulating two different ways in which languages mark telicity in the verbal phrase. In order to distinguish betweenthe two views of transfer with experimental means, the study examines the competence of two groups of low-intermediate learners of English, native speakers of Spanish, a language sharing the same parameter value with English, and of Bulgarian, a language exhibiting the opposite parametric value. Results indicate that the differences in the performance of learners from the two language groups are directly traceable to their native language. Thus the full-transfer/full-access hypothesis receives experimental support.
739-770
Slabakova, Roumyana
1bda11ce-ce3d-4146-8ae3-4a486b6f5bde
2000
Slabakova, Roumyana
1bda11ce-ce3d-4146-8ae3-4a486b6f5bde
Slabakova, Roumyana
(2000)
L1 transfer revisited: the L2 acquisition of telicity in English by Spanish and Slavic native speakers.
Linguistics, 38 (4), .
(doi:10.1515/ling.2000.004).
Abstract
This paper investigates the claim that the native grammar of the learners is the initial state of second-language acquisition, as far as the acquisition of universal grammar parameters is concerned. Two opposing views on L1 transfer are discussed: the first hypothesis maintains that learners start outwith the L1 parameter value (Schwartz and Sprouse’s 1994, 1996 full-transfer/full-access hypothesis), while the second hypothesis argues that L1 transfer plays a minimal role in the acquisition process (Epstein et al.1996’s no-transfer/full-access hypothesis). The parameter under investigation is the aspect parameter, postulating two different ways in which languages mark telicity in the verbal phrase. In order to distinguish betweenthe two views of transfer with experimental means, the study examines the competence of two groups of low-intermediate learners of English, native speakers of Spanish, a language sharing the same parameter value with English, and of Bulgarian, a language exhibiting the opposite parametric value. Results indicate that the differences in the performance of learners from the two language groups are directly traceable to their native language. Thus the full-transfer/full-access hypothesis receives experimental support.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2000
Organisations:
Modern Languages
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 353572
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/353572
ISSN: 0024-3949
PURE UUID: 59c2647e-ee8a-415c-a2af-622816aac45a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Jun 2013 13:24
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics