The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis

Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
Objective: To compare the volume and quality of original research in primary care published by researchers from primary care in the United Kingdom against five countries with well established academic primary care.

Design: Bibliometric analysis.

Setting: United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands.Studies reviewed Research publications relevant to comprehensive primary care and authored by researchers from primary care, recorded in Medline and Embase, with publication dates 2001-7 inclusive.

Main outcome measures: Volume of published activity of generalist primary care researchers and the quality of the research output by those publishing the most using citation metrics: numbers of cited papers, proportion of cited papers, and mean citation scores.

Results: 82?169 papers published between 2001 and 2007 in the six countries were classified as research on primary care. In a 15% pragmatic random sample of these records, 40% of research on primary care from the United Kingdom and 46% from the Netherlands was authored by researchers employed in a primary care setting or employed in academic departments of primary care. The 141 researchers with the highest volume of publications reporting research findings published between 2001 and 2007 (inclusive) authored or part authored 8.3% of the total sample of papers. For authors with the highest proportion of publications cited at least five times, the best performers came from the United States (n=5), United Kingdom (n=4), and the Netherlands (n=2). In the top 10 of authors with the highest proportions of publications achieving 20 or more citations, six were from the United Kingdom and four from the United States. The mean Hirsch index (measure of a researcher’s productivity and impact of the published work) was 14 for the Netherlands, 13 for the United Kingdom, 12 for the United States, 7 for Canada, 4 for Australia, and 3 for Germany.

Conclusion: This international comparison of the volume and citation rates of papers by researchers from primary care consistently placed UK researchers among the best performers internationally
0959-8138
d1028
Glanville, J.
8f03bd66-069e-4e68-b4eb-b7549edce062
Kendrick, T.
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
McNally, R.
2075c4bd-774d-474c-ac95-bdb195e90061
Campbell, J.
d38acff7-94df-4466-b716-fcb647155b8f
Hobbs, F.R.
866e2a15-0d4c-4b45-a314-29bbb8301df2
Glanville, J.
8f03bd66-069e-4e68-b4eb-b7549edce062
Kendrick, T.
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
McNally, R.
2075c4bd-774d-474c-ac95-bdb195e90061
Campbell, J.
d38acff7-94df-4466-b716-fcb647155b8f
Hobbs, F.R.
866e2a15-0d4c-4b45-a314-29bbb8301df2

Glanville, J., Kendrick, T., McNally, R., Campbell, J. and Hobbs, F.R. (2011) Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis. British Medical Journal, 342, d1028. (doi:10.1136/bmj.d1028). (PMID:21385804)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: To compare the volume and quality of original research in primary care published by researchers from primary care in the United Kingdom against five countries with well established academic primary care.

Design: Bibliometric analysis.

Setting: United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands.Studies reviewed Research publications relevant to comprehensive primary care and authored by researchers from primary care, recorded in Medline and Embase, with publication dates 2001-7 inclusive.

Main outcome measures: Volume of published activity of generalist primary care researchers and the quality of the research output by those publishing the most using citation metrics: numbers of cited papers, proportion of cited papers, and mean citation scores.

Results: 82?169 papers published between 2001 and 2007 in the six countries were classified as research on primary care. In a 15% pragmatic random sample of these records, 40% of research on primary care from the United Kingdom and 46% from the Netherlands was authored by researchers employed in a primary care setting or employed in academic departments of primary care. The 141 researchers with the highest volume of publications reporting research findings published between 2001 and 2007 (inclusive) authored or part authored 8.3% of the total sample of papers. For authors with the highest proportion of publications cited at least five times, the best performers came from the United States (n=5), United Kingdom (n=4), and the Netherlands (n=2). In the top 10 of authors with the highest proportions of publications achieving 20 or more citations, six were from the United Kingdom and four from the United States. The mean Hirsch index (measure of a researcher’s productivity and impact of the published work) was 14 for the Netherlands, 13 for the United Kingdom, 12 for the United States, 7 for Canada, 4 for Australia, and 3 for Germany.

Conclusion: This international comparison of the volume and citation rates of papers by researchers from primary care consistently placed UK researchers among the best performers internationally

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 8 March 2011
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 353945
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/353945
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 0314f553-7e59-4f6a-bd66-39dcaf0a912c
ORCID for T. Kendrick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-9381

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jun 2013 13:10
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Glanville
Author: T. Kendrick ORCID iD
Author: R. McNally
Author: J. Campbell
Author: F.R. Hobbs

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×