The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Instructions to rate genital vasocongestion increases genital and self-reported sexual arousal but not coherence between genital and self-reported sexual arousal

Instructions to rate genital vasocongestion increases genital and self-reported sexual arousal but not coherence between genital and self-reported sexual arousal
Instructions to rate genital vasocongestion increases genital and self-reported sexual arousal but not coherence between genital and self-reported sexual arousal
Introduction: Women are often reported to have a low coherence (often referred to as “discordance” in sexuality literature) between their genital response and self-reported sexual arousal.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether differing instructions for rating sexual arousal would increase the coherence between genital response and self-reported arousal in women.

Methods: Genital responses were recorded, using vaginal photoplethysmography, from 32 young women while they fantasized in three different conditions. Conditions instructed women to rate their overall sexual arousal, any physical cues, and genital blood flow.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was the coherence of vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA) and reported sexual response in the three conditions.

Results: Unexpectedly, both VPA response and self-reported sexual arousal were higher when women were asked to rate their genital blood flow. Examining only participants who reported at least some sexual arousal in all conditions (n?=?17), coherence was highest when women were instructed to rate overall sexual arousal.

Conclusion: Results suggest that focusing on genital blood flow during sexual fantasy may increase women's (self-reported and genital) sexual response. Focusing on any physical arousal cues during sexual fantasy was associated with lower coherence of women's genital response and self-reported arousal compared with when they were instructed to rate their overall sexual arousal. Prause N, Barela J, Roberts V, and Graham C. Instructions to rate genital vasocongestion increases genital and self-reported sexual arousal but not coherence between genital and self-reported sexual arousal.
emotion coherence, genital vasocongestion, hedonic processing, sexual motivation, time series, vaginal photoplethysmograph
1743-6095
Prause, Nicole
0f441172-ff83-451d-b327-4e3650ddd6e3
Barela, James
54e56dd9-1a78-44b8-b8af-2f3aa02e9ff0
Roberts, Verena
390b8371-cf7c-436a-b7ae-6107c3a7d1db
Graham, Cynthia
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8
Prause, Nicole
0f441172-ff83-451d-b327-4e3650ddd6e3
Barela, James
54e56dd9-1a78-44b8-b8af-2f3aa02e9ff0
Roberts, Verena
390b8371-cf7c-436a-b7ae-6107c3a7d1db
Graham, Cynthia
ac400331-f231-4449-a69b-ec9a477224c8

Prause, Nicole, Barela, James, Roberts, Verena and Graham, Cynthia (2013) Instructions to rate genital vasocongestion increases genital and self-reported sexual arousal but not coherence between genital and self-reported sexual arousal. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. (doi:10.1111/jsm.12228). (PMID:23841796)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: Women are often reported to have a low coherence (often referred to as “discordance” in sexuality literature) between their genital response and self-reported sexual arousal.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether differing instructions for rating sexual arousal would increase the coherence between genital response and self-reported arousal in women.

Methods: Genital responses were recorded, using vaginal photoplethysmography, from 32 young women while they fantasized in three different conditions. Conditions instructed women to rate their overall sexual arousal, any physical cues, and genital blood flow.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was the coherence of vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA) and reported sexual response in the three conditions.

Results: Unexpectedly, both VPA response and self-reported sexual arousal were higher when women were asked to rate their genital blood flow. Examining only participants who reported at least some sexual arousal in all conditions (n?=?17), coherence was highest when women were instructed to rate overall sexual arousal.

Conclusion: Results suggest that focusing on genital blood flow during sexual fantasy may increase women's (self-reported and genital) sexual response. Focusing on any physical arousal cues during sexual fantasy was associated with lower coherence of women's genital response and self-reported arousal compared with when they were instructed to rate their overall sexual arousal. Prause N, Barela J, Roberts V, and Graham C. Instructions to rate genital vasocongestion increases genital and self-reported sexual arousal but not coherence between genital and self-reported sexual arousal.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 10 July 2013
Keywords: emotion coherence, genital vasocongestion, hedonic processing, sexual motivation, time series, vaginal photoplethysmograph
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 354617
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/354617
ISSN: 1743-6095
PURE UUID: 78fc4a10-af56-41e7-bb49-f9fa33fced08
ORCID for Cynthia Graham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-599X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jul 2013 13:36
Last modified: 21 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicole Prause
Author: James Barela
Author: Verena Roberts
Author: Cynthia Graham ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×