The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Explaining the effects of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses: a process evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial

Explaining the effects of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses: a process evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial
Explaining the effects of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses: a process evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial
There is only limited understanding of why hand hygiene improvement strategies are successful or fail. It is therefore important to look inside the 'black box' of such strategies, to ascertain which components of a strategy work well or less well. This study examined which components of two hand hygiene improvement strategies were associated with increased nurses' hand hygiene compliance. A process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in which part of the nursing wards of three hospitals in the Netherlands received a state-of-the-art strategy, including education, reminders, feedback, and optimising materials and facilities; another part received a team and leaders-directed strategy that included all elements of the state-of-the-art strategy, supplemented with activities aimed at the social and enhancing leadership. This process evaluation used four sets of measures: effects on nurses' hand hygiene compliance, adherence to the improvement strategies, contextual factors, and nurses' experiences with strategy components. Analyses of variance and multiple regression analyses were used to explore changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance and thereby better understand trial effects. Both strategies were performed with good adherence to protocol. Two contextual factors were associated with changes in hand hygiene compliance: a hospital effect in long term (p < 0.05), and high hand hygiene baseline scores were associated with smaller effects (p < 0.01). In short term, changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance were positively correlated with experienced feedback about their hand hygiene performance (p < 0.05). In the long run, several items of the components 'social influence' (i.e., addressing each other on undesirable hand hygiene behaviour p < 0.01), and 'leadership' (i.e., ward manager holds team members accountable for hand hygiene performance p < 0.01) correlated positively with changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance. This study illustrates the use of a process evaluation to uncover mechanisms underlying change in hand hygiene improvement strategies. Our study results demonstrate the added value of specific aspects of social influence and leadership in hand hygiene improvement strategies, thus offering an interpretation of the trial effects.
process evaluation, quality improvement, implementation, handwashing, infection control, randomised controlled trial, leadership
Huis, Anita
cceacfe4-1e7c-46ce-94d4-ca778ad9f644
Holleman, Gerda
95aba7dd-44b1-4e29-894f-7f16bef46678
van Achterberg, Theo
eb49404e-62c6-427d-bb94-580254177a30
Grol, Richard
7079ec99-ac2b-4d24-9ddd-513e32814c04
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Hulscher, Marlies
cbd15b6a-6e4d-4831-9c8a-3df23fd53fba
Huis, Anita
cceacfe4-1e7c-46ce-94d4-ca778ad9f644
Holleman, Gerda
95aba7dd-44b1-4e29-894f-7f16bef46678
van Achterberg, Theo
eb49404e-62c6-427d-bb94-580254177a30
Grol, Richard
7079ec99-ac2b-4d24-9ddd-513e32814c04
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Hulscher, Marlies
cbd15b6a-6e4d-4831-9c8a-3df23fd53fba

Huis, Anita, Holleman, Gerda, van Achterberg, Theo, Grol, Richard, Schoonhoven, Lisette and Hulscher, Marlies (2013) Explaining the effects of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses: a process evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. Implementation Science, 8 (41). (doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-41). (PMID:23566429)

Record type: Article

Abstract

There is only limited understanding of why hand hygiene improvement strategies are successful or fail. It is therefore important to look inside the 'black box' of such strategies, to ascertain which components of a strategy work well or less well. This study examined which components of two hand hygiene improvement strategies were associated with increased nurses' hand hygiene compliance. A process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in which part of the nursing wards of three hospitals in the Netherlands received a state-of-the-art strategy, including education, reminders, feedback, and optimising materials and facilities; another part received a team and leaders-directed strategy that included all elements of the state-of-the-art strategy, supplemented with activities aimed at the social and enhancing leadership. This process evaluation used four sets of measures: effects on nurses' hand hygiene compliance, adherence to the improvement strategies, contextual factors, and nurses' experiences with strategy components. Analyses of variance and multiple regression analyses were used to explore changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance and thereby better understand trial effects. Both strategies were performed with good adherence to protocol. Two contextual factors were associated with changes in hand hygiene compliance: a hospital effect in long term (p < 0.05), and high hand hygiene baseline scores were associated with smaller effects (p < 0.01). In short term, changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance were positively correlated with experienced feedback about their hand hygiene performance (p < 0.05). In the long run, several items of the components 'social influence' (i.e., addressing each other on undesirable hand hygiene behaviour p < 0.01), and 'leadership' (i.e., ward manager holds team members accountable for hand hygiene performance p < 0.01) correlated positively with changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance. This study illustrates the use of a process evaluation to uncover mechanisms underlying change in hand hygiene improvement strategies. Our study results demonstrate the added value of specific aspects of social influence and leadership in hand hygiene improvement strategies, thus offering an interpretation of the trial effects.

Text
Huis et al Explaining the effects of two2013.pdf - Version of Record
Download (277kB)

More information

Published date: 8 April 2013
Keywords: process evaluation, quality improvement, implementation, handwashing, infection control, randomised controlled trial, leadership
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 354746
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/354746
PURE UUID: d3eb5d2c-c899-4444-84df-b92236db973d
ORCID for Lisette Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jul 2013 09:57
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anita Huis
Author: Gerda Holleman
Author: Theo van Achterberg
Author: Richard Grol
Author: Marlies Hulscher

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×