The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

"Short" thrombelastography as a test of platelet reactivity in response to antiplatelet therapy: validation and reproducibility

"Short" thrombelastography as a test of platelet reactivity in response to antiplatelet therapy: validation and reproducibility
"Short" thrombelastography as a test of platelet reactivity in response to antiplatelet therapy: validation and reproducibility
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention experience recurrent ischaemic events despite standard doses of treatment. Although clinical studies show significant heterogeneity in antiplatelet therapy responses, routine testing is not undertaken due to (i) lack of a standardized test, and (ii) poor clarity with regards to definition of abnormal responses. Short Thrombelastography (s-TEG) is a validated test that allows rapid measurement of clotting responses to antiplatelet therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the reproducibility of s-TEG and to compare s-TEG with VerifyNow in assessment of responses to antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS: (i) intra-individual variability was assessed using s-TEG Area Under the Curve (AUC15) and maximum amplitude (MA) in one volunteer at 20 time-points on no medication and at 10 time-points pre and post 300?mg aspirin treatment (ii) inter-individual variability was determined from a retrospective analysis of data on MA and AUC15 obtained from 56 volunteers on no medication, 25 volunteers pre and post 300?mg aspirin treatment and 28 patients pre and post 600?mg clopidogrel treatment (iii) a comparison between AUC15 arachidonic-acid (AA) channel and VerifyNow aspirin response units (VN ARU) and between AUC15 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) channel and VerifyNow P2Y12 reactivity units (VN PRU) was obtained from retrospective analysis of data at 370 and 296 time-points respectively.

RESULTS: There was minimal intra-and inter-individual variability in MA and AUC15 in the AA, ADP and thrombin channels. There was a good correlation between AA AUC15 and VN ARU (r?=?0.701, p?<?0.001) and between ADP AUC15 and VN PRU (r?=?0.609, p?<?0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: s-TEG is a reproducible and reliable near-patient test that correlates well with VerifyNow. Large scale studies are needed to determine its potential role in individually tailored antiplatelet therapy.
thrombelastography, antiplatelet therapy, clotting
0953-7104
210-216
Sambu, Nalyaka
7d0ba3fb-e39e-48d7-a0e4-ce249acc5980
Hobson, Alex
d0f3c2fb-80d2-4154-9d91-9f93ea3205eb
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Sambu, Nalyaka
7d0ba3fb-e39e-48d7-a0e4-ce249acc5980
Hobson, Alex
d0f3c2fb-80d2-4154-9d91-9f93ea3205eb
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4

Sambu, Nalyaka, Hobson, Alex and Curzen, Nick (2011) "Short" thrombelastography as a test of platelet reactivity in response to antiplatelet therapy: validation and reproducibility. Platelets, 22 (3), 210-216. (doi:10.3109/09537104.2010.543201). (PMID:21231856)

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention experience recurrent ischaemic events despite standard doses of treatment. Although clinical studies show significant heterogeneity in antiplatelet therapy responses, routine testing is not undertaken due to (i) lack of a standardized test, and (ii) poor clarity with regards to definition of abnormal responses. Short Thrombelastography (s-TEG) is a validated test that allows rapid measurement of clotting responses to antiplatelet therapy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the reproducibility of s-TEG and to compare s-TEG with VerifyNow in assessment of responses to antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS: (i) intra-individual variability was assessed using s-TEG Area Under the Curve (AUC15) and maximum amplitude (MA) in one volunteer at 20 time-points on no medication and at 10 time-points pre and post 300?mg aspirin treatment (ii) inter-individual variability was determined from a retrospective analysis of data on MA and AUC15 obtained from 56 volunteers on no medication, 25 volunteers pre and post 300?mg aspirin treatment and 28 patients pre and post 600?mg clopidogrel treatment (iii) a comparison between AUC15 arachidonic-acid (AA) channel and VerifyNow aspirin response units (VN ARU) and between AUC15 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) channel and VerifyNow P2Y12 reactivity units (VN PRU) was obtained from retrospective analysis of data at 370 and 296 time-points respectively.

RESULTS: There was minimal intra-and inter-individual variability in MA and AUC15 in the AA, ADP and thrombin channels. There was a good correlation between AA AUC15 and VN ARU (r?=?0.701, p?<?0.001) and between ADP AUC15 and VN PRU (r?=?0.609, p?<?0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: s-TEG is a reproducible and reliable near-patient test that correlates well with VerifyNow. Large scale studies are needed to determine its potential role in individually tailored antiplatelet therapy.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: May 2011
Keywords: thrombelastography, antiplatelet therapy, clotting
Organisations: Human Development & Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 355218
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/355218
ISSN: 0953-7104
PURE UUID: 58c6b983-07ea-4a96-b95d-c91090805be9
ORCID for Nick Curzen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Aug 2013 15:10
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nalyaka Sambu
Author: Alex Hobson
Author: Nick Curzen ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×