Evaluation of graphical control flow management approaches for Event-B modelling
Evaluation of graphical control flow management approaches for Event-B modelling
Integrating graphical representations with formal methods can help bridge the gap between requirements and formal modelling. In this paper, we compare and evaluate two graphical approaches aiming at describing control flows and refinement in Event-B, and we use a fire dispatch system case study to perform this evaluation. The fire dispatch system case study provides a good example of a complex workflow through which we try to identify a process that facilitates defining the structural and the behavioural parts of the Event-B model. In our case study, we focus on building the dynamic part of the model to evaluate the two diagrammatic notations: UML Activity Diagrams and Atomicity Decomposition Diagrams. Based on our evaluation, we try to identify the advantages and limitations of both approaches. Finally, we try to compare how both graphical notations can affect the Event-B formal modelling of our case study.
event-B, atomicity decomposition, UML activity diagram, control flow
Dghaym, Dana
b7b69fe2-c9ff-43ad-a6ba-8b41d6fd19fc
Butler, Michael
54b9c2c7-2574-438e-9a36-6842a3d53ed0
Salehi Fathabadi, Asieh
b799ee35-4032-4e7c-b4b2-34109af8aa75
January 2014
Dghaym, Dana
b7b69fe2-c9ff-43ad-a6ba-8b41d6fd19fc
Butler, Michael
54b9c2c7-2574-438e-9a36-6842a3d53ed0
Salehi Fathabadi, Asieh
b799ee35-4032-4e7c-b4b2-34109af8aa75
Dghaym, Dana, Butler, Michael and Salehi Fathabadi, Asieh
(2014)
Evaluation of graphical control flow management approaches for Event-B modelling.
Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Automated Verification of Critical Systems (AVocS 2013), Guildford, United Kingdom.
15 pp
.
(doi:10.14279/tuj.eceasst.66.891).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Integrating graphical representations with formal methods can help bridge the gap between requirements and formal modelling. In this paper, we compare and evaluate two graphical approaches aiming at describing control flows and refinement in Event-B, and we use a fire dispatch system case study to perform this evaluation. The fire dispatch system case study provides a good example of a complex workflow through which we try to identify a process that facilitates defining the structural and the behavioural parts of the Event-B model. In our case study, we focus on building the dynamic part of the model to evaluate the two diagrammatic notations: UML Activity Diagrams and Atomicity Decomposition Diagrams. Based on our evaluation, we try to identify the advantages and limitations of both approaches. Finally, we try to compare how both graphical notations can affect the Event-B formal modelling of our case study.
Text
891-2700-1-PB.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 August 2013
Published date: January 2014
Venue - Dates:
Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Automated Verification of Critical Systems (AVocS 2013), Guildford, United Kingdom, 2013-08-01
Keywords:
event-B, atomicity decomposition, UML activity diagram, control flow
Organisations:
Electronic & Software Systems
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 355223
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/355223
PURE UUID: ceb96339-4a65-4219-94ed-8046e5758b9e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Aug 2013 14:46
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Dana Dghaym
Author:
Michael Butler
Author:
Asieh Salehi Fathabadi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics