The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Review: Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs

Review: Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs
Review: Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs
Background: there are now several systematic reviews of RCTs testing self-management for those with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Evidence for the effectiveness of self-management interventions in chronic musculoskeletal pain is equivocal and it is not clear for which sub-groups of patients SM is optimally effective.

Aims: to systematically review randomized controlled trials of self-management for chronic musculoskeletal pain that reported predictors, i.e., ‘baseline factors that predict outcome independent of any treatment effect’; moderators, i.e., ‘baseline factors which predict benefit from a particular treatment’; or mediators i.e., ‘factors measured during treatment that impact on outcome’ of outcome.

Method: we searched relevant electronic databases. We assessed the evidence according to the methodological strengths of the studies. We did meta-regression analyses for age and gender, as potential moderators.

Results: although the methodological quality of primary trials was good, there were few relevant studies; most were compromised by lack of power for moderator and mediator analyses. We found strong evidence that self-efficacy and depression at baseline predict outcome and strong evidence that pain catastrophizing and physical activity can mediate outcome from self-management. There was insufficient data on moderators of treatment.

Conclusions: the current evidence suggests four factors that relate to outcome as predictors/mediators, but there is no evidence for effect moderators. Future studies of mediation and moderation should be designed with ‘a priori’ hypotheses and adequate statistical power
1090-3801
775.e1-775.e11
Miles, Clare L.
2c3cd0e5-1aaf-46b6-8228-188c843bad4e
Pincusl, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Carnesl, Dawn
b9c63c6f-f585-4ee0-ac3d-2baeacadf293
Homerl, Kate E.
7f8a8a20-210f-4ed9-a21f-0258c2a19055
Taylorl, Stephanie J.C.
a1328721-b3a6-4738-98d0-80e5af9e47be
Bremnerl, Stephen A.
38aa8b26-78c0-4f9c-b0e6-57c977e778a3
Rahmanl, Anisur
a4f6f085-2d98-43f8-b950-9cb84d5677eb
Underwoodl, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
Miles, Clare L.
2c3cd0e5-1aaf-46b6-8228-188c843bad4e
Pincusl, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Carnesl, Dawn
b9c63c6f-f585-4ee0-ac3d-2baeacadf293
Homerl, Kate E.
7f8a8a20-210f-4ed9-a21f-0258c2a19055
Taylorl, Stephanie J.C.
a1328721-b3a6-4738-98d0-80e5af9e47be
Bremnerl, Stephen A.
38aa8b26-78c0-4f9c-b0e6-57c977e778a3
Rahmanl, Anisur
a4f6f085-2d98-43f8-b950-9cb84d5677eb
Underwoodl, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62

Miles, Clare L., Pincusl, Tamar, Carnesl, Dawn, Homerl, Kate E., Taylorl, Stephanie J.C., Bremnerl, Stephen A., Rahmanl, Anisur and Underwoodl, Martin (2012) Review: Can we identify how programmes aimed at promoting self-management in musculoskeletal pain work and who benefits? A systematic review of sub-group analysis within RCTs. European Journal of Pain, 15 (8), 775.e1-775.e11. (doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.016).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: there are now several systematic reviews of RCTs testing self-management for those with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Evidence for the effectiveness of self-management interventions in chronic musculoskeletal pain is equivocal and it is not clear for which sub-groups of patients SM is optimally effective.

Aims: to systematically review randomized controlled trials of self-management for chronic musculoskeletal pain that reported predictors, i.e., ‘baseline factors that predict outcome independent of any treatment effect’; moderators, i.e., ‘baseline factors which predict benefit from a particular treatment’; or mediators i.e., ‘factors measured during treatment that impact on outcome’ of outcome.

Method: we searched relevant electronic databases. We assessed the evidence according to the methodological strengths of the studies. We did meta-regression analyses for age and gender, as potential moderators.

Results: although the methodological quality of primary trials was good, there were few relevant studies; most were compromised by lack of power for moderator and mediator analyses. We found strong evidence that self-efficacy and depression at baseline predict outcome and strong evidence that pain catastrophizing and physical activity can mediate outcome from self-management. There was insufficient data on moderators of treatment.

Conclusions: the current evidence suggests four factors that relate to outcome as predictors/mediators, but there is no evidence for effect moderators. Future studies of mediation and moderation should be designed with ‘a priori’ hypotheses and adequate statistical power

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2012
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 355338
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/355338
ISSN: 1090-3801
PURE UUID: 8bf04a3f-fe26-409a-ac59-90f2b6bc9d82
ORCID for Tamar Pincusl: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Aug 2013 14:14
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Clare L. Miles
Author: Tamar Pincusl ORCID iD
Author: Dawn Carnesl
Author: Kate E. Homerl
Author: Stephanie J.C. Taylorl
Author: Stephen A. Bremnerl
Author: Anisur Rahmanl
Author: Martin Underwoodl

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×