Classifying the severity of paediatric chronic pain - an application of the chronic pain grading
Classifying the severity of paediatric chronic pain - an application of the chronic pain grading
Background: The chronic pain grading (CPG), a standard approach to classify the severity of pain conditions in adults, combines the characteristics of pain intensity and pain-related disability. However, in children and adolescents, the CPG has only been validated in a school sample, but not in the actual target population, i.e., clinical populations with pain.
Methods: In the present study, we applied the CPG to a tertiary sample of adolescents with chronic pain (n?=?1242). Construct validity, sensitivity to change and prognostic utility were examined.
Results: Results indicate that most adolescents were equally classified into the three higher severity grades. Higher CPG classification was associated with more pain locations, higher pain frequency, longer pain duration, extensive use of health care and more depressive symptoms. Adolescents with a high CPG received recommendations for inpatient treatment more often; however, the prognostic utility for therapy recommendation - as operationalized in this study - was low. Sensitivity to change was assessed via reassessment at follow-up for a subsample of 490 adolescents. The majority of adolescents improved to a less severe CPG; changes were more common in the high severity range.
Conslusion: The CPG may be applied to adolescent tertiary care samples and to assess outcomes in clinical trials. However, in this study it was not appropriate to assign adolescent patients to different treatment options. Future work should focus on developing a comprehensive assessment tool for assigning patients to different treatments.
Wager, J.
13a473de-a212-40b9-b474-ea9d311b4ae2
Hechler, T.
1e76b19d-2240-49e1-a98f-aedcd8914bdd
Darlington, A.S.
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Hirschfield, G.
8890222e-0221-418c-a6a9-55c171369649
Vocks, S.
72117800-2105-45ed-9922-700eae5e9109
Zernikow, B.
f5497268-83a4-4219-9fa3-ca3d3b9b1cff
Wager, J.
13a473de-a212-40b9-b474-ea9d311b4ae2
Hechler, T.
1e76b19d-2240-49e1-a98f-aedcd8914bdd
Darlington, A.S.
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Hirschfield, G.
8890222e-0221-418c-a6a9-55c171369649
Vocks, S.
72117800-2105-45ed-9922-700eae5e9109
Zernikow, B.
f5497268-83a4-4219-9fa3-ca3d3b9b1cff
Wager, J., Hechler, T., Darlington, A.S., Hirschfield, G., Vocks, S. and Zernikow, B.
(2013)
Classifying the severity of paediatric chronic pain - an application of the chronic pain grading.
European Journal of Pain.
(doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00314.x).
(PMID:23576527)
Abstract
Background: The chronic pain grading (CPG), a standard approach to classify the severity of pain conditions in adults, combines the characteristics of pain intensity and pain-related disability. However, in children and adolescents, the CPG has only been validated in a school sample, but not in the actual target population, i.e., clinical populations with pain.
Methods: In the present study, we applied the CPG to a tertiary sample of adolescents with chronic pain (n?=?1242). Construct validity, sensitivity to change and prognostic utility were examined.
Results: Results indicate that most adolescents were equally classified into the three higher severity grades. Higher CPG classification was associated with more pain locations, higher pain frequency, longer pain duration, extensive use of health care and more depressive symptoms. Adolescents with a high CPG received recommendations for inpatient treatment more often; however, the prognostic utility for therapy recommendation - as operationalized in this study - was low. Sensitivity to change was assessed via reassessment at follow-up for a subsample of 490 adolescents. The majority of adolescents improved to a less severe CPG; changes were more common in the high severity range.
Conslusion: The CPG may be applied to adolescent tertiary care samples and to assess outcomes in clinical trials. However, in this study it was not appropriate to assign adolescent patients to different treatment options. Future work should focus on developing a comprehensive assessment tool for assigning patients to different treatments.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 April 2013
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 355749
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/355749
ISSN: 1090-3801
PURE UUID: 6a79bb86-7af8-4116-8c62-b4e11c3029db
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Sep 2013 12:13
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J. Wager
Author:
T. Hechler
Author:
G. Hirschfield
Author:
S. Vocks
Author:
B. Zernikow
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics