Rethinking the priority of practical reason in Kant
Rethinking the priority of practical reason in Kant
Throughout the critical period Kant enigmatically insists that reason is a ‘unity’, thereby suggesting that both our theoretical and practical endeavors are grounded in one and the same rational capacity. How Kant's unity thesis ought to be interpreted and whether it can be substantiated remain sources of controversy in the literature. According to the strong reading of this claim, reason is a ‘unity’ because all our reasoning, including our theoretical reasoning, functions practically. Although several prominent commentators endorse this view, it is widely thought to lack exegetical support. This paper seeks to strengthen the case for this reading by showing how theoretical reason's positive function, as Kant presents it in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, may be construed as fundamentally practical. I argue that reason's supreme regulative principle ought to be understood as a categorical practical imperative. This interpretation, I suggest, resolves the apparent inconsistencies that blight Kant's account of the principle in the Appendix, while bringing greater overall coherence to his account of theoretical reason's regulative function.
78-102
Mudd, Sasha
104e14da-7e8c-49b0-a7fe-9853bddbb8c5
March 2016
Mudd, Sasha
104e14da-7e8c-49b0-a7fe-9853bddbb8c5
Mudd, Sasha
(2016)
Rethinking the priority of practical reason in Kant.
European Journal of Philosophy, 24 (1), , [ejop.12055].
(doi:10.1111/ejop.12055).
Abstract
Throughout the critical period Kant enigmatically insists that reason is a ‘unity’, thereby suggesting that both our theoretical and practical endeavors are grounded in one and the same rational capacity. How Kant's unity thesis ought to be interpreted and whether it can be substantiated remain sources of controversy in the literature. According to the strong reading of this claim, reason is a ‘unity’ because all our reasoning, including our theoretical reasoning, functions practically. Although several prominent commentators endorse this view, it is widely thought to lack exegetical support. This paper seeks to strengthen the case for this reading by showing how theoretical reason's positive function, as Kant presents it in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, may be construed as fundamentally practical. I argue that reason's supreme regulative principle ought to be understood as a categorical practical imperative. This interpretation, I suggest, resolves the apparent inconsistencies that blight Kant's account of the principle in the Appendix, while bringing greater overall coherence to his account of theoretical reason's regulative function.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 September 2013
Published date: March 2016
Organisations:
Philosophy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 356058
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356058
ISSN: 0966-8373
PURE UUID: a9661d06-cc19-45ad-a00a-5db07f87dc00
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Sep 2013 11:09
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:44
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sasha Mudd
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics