The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rethinking the priority of practical reason in Kant

Rethinking the priority of practical reason in Kant
Rethinking the priority of practical reason in Kant
Throughout the critical period Kant enigmatically insists that reason is a ‘unity’, thereby suggesting that both our theoretical and practical endeavors are grounded in one and the same rational capacity. How Kant's unity thesis ought to be interpreted and whether it can be substantiated remain sources of controversy in the literature. According to the strong reading of this claim, reason is a ‘unity’ because all our reasoning, including our theoretical reasoning, functions practically. Although several prominent commentators endorse this view, it is widely thought to lack exegetical support. This paper seeks to strengthen the case for this reading by showing how theoretical reason's positive function, as Kant presents it in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, may be construed as fundamentally practical. I argue that reason's supreme regulative principle ought to be understood as a categorical practical imperative. This interpretation, I suggest, resolves the apparent inconsistencies that blight Kant's account of the principle in the Appendix, while bringing greater overall coherence to his account of theoretical reason's regulative function.
0966-8373
78-102
Mudd, Sasha
104e14da-7e8c-49b0-a7fe-9853bddbb8c5
Mudd, Sasha
104e14da-7e8c-49b0-a7fe-9853bddbb8c5

Mudd, Sasha (2016) Rethinking the priority of practical reason in Kant. European Journal of Philosophy, 24 (1), 78-102, [ejop.12055]. (doi:10.1111/ejop.12055).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Throughout the critical period Kant enigmatically insists that reason is a ‘unity’, thereby suggesting that both our theoretical and practical endeavors are grounded in one and the same rational capacity. How Kant's unity thesis ought to be interpreted and whether it can be substantiated remain sources of controversy in the literature. According to the strong reading of this claim, reason is a ‘unity’ because all our reasoning, including our theoretical reasoning, functions practically. Although several prominent commentators endorse this view, it is widely thought to lack exegetical support. This paper seeks to strengthen the case for this reading by showing how theoretical reason's positive function, as Kant presents it in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, may be construed as fundamentally practical. I argue that reason's supreme regulative principle ought to be understood as a categorical practical imperative. This interpretation, I suggest, resolves the apparent inconsistencies that blight Kant's account of the principle in the Appendix, while bringing greater overall coherence to his account of theoretical reason's regulative function.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 16 September 2013
Published date: March 2016
Organisations: Philosophy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 356058
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356058
ISSN: 0966-8373
PURE UUID: a9661d06-cc19-45ad-a00a-5db07f87dc00

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2013 11:09
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 14:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sasha Mudd

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×