Experimental partnering: interpreting improvisatory habits in the research field
Experimental partnering: interpreting improvisatory habits in the research field
This paper proposes that established research techniques can be developed in new directions by becoming attentive to the ways in which novel epistemological and ontological frameworks can shape the production of research knowledges. Drawing upon ideas from performance theory and science studies, and two brief fieldwork examples – archival research on the MRC’s Common Cold Unit and participant observation of the challenge of moving a herd of cattle – we argue that habits are also always to extent improvised; shaped by the capacities of human bodies to sense and respond to the nonhuman agentive world around them, including methodological habits. We propose a new term, ‘experimental partnering’ to define an interpretative approach that is attentive to how practice can illuminate the improvisatory or unstable temporary alignments that underlie some habits. ‘Experimental partnering’ is not offering a new way to access the research field, but a term to express a particular interpretative mode that draws attention to human-nonhuman relations and assemblages, fostering new apprehensions of how these more than social relations modify and interrupt the habitual.
45-57
Roe, Emma
f7579e4e-3721-4046-a2d4-d6395f61c675
Greenhough, Beth
95a602e8-dd79-4d62-b3d5-0075ae70398a
January 2014
Roe, Emma
f7579e4e-3721-4046-a2d4-d6395f61c675
Greenhough, Beth
95a602e8-dd79-4d62-b3d5-0075ae70398a
Roe, Emma and Greenhough, Beth
(2014)
Experimental partnering: interpreting improvisatory habits in the research field.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17 (1), .
(doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.854014).
Abstract
This paper proposes that established research techniques can be developed in new directions by becoming attentive to the ways in which novel epistemological and ontological frameworks can shape the production of research knowledges. Drawing upon ideas from performance theory and science studies, and two brief fieldwork examples – archival research on the MRC’s Common Cold Unit and participant observation of the challenge of moving a herd of cattle – we argue that habits are also always to extent improvised; shaped by the capacities of human bodies to sense and respond to the nonhuman agentive world around them, including methodological habits. We propose a new term, ‘experimental partnering’ to define an interpretative approach that is attentive to how practice can illuminate the improvisatory or unstable temporary alignments that underlie some habits. ‘Experimental partnering’ is not offering a new way to access the research field, but a term to express a particular interpretative mode that draws attention to human-nonhuman relations and assemblages, fostering new apprehensions of how these more than social relations modify and interrupt the habitual.
Text
Experimental Partnering online version.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 8 October 2013
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 November 2013
Published date: January 2014
Organisations:
Economy, Society and Space
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 356359
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356359
ISSN: 1364-5579
PURE UUID: 3091bd09-65a8-498e-8975-a110c3f868d4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Sep 2013 12:53
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:28
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Beth Greenhough
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics