The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fluvial stability of a transverse vs. a longitudinal riprap protection

Fluvial stability of a transverse vs. a longitudinal riprap protection
Fluvial stability of a transverse vs. a longitudinal riprap protection
An experimental study was conducted in a laboratory to determine the influence of length, width, and protrusion of non-continuous riprap protections on shear failure conditions. The incipient motion of particles as a failure criterion and the reference transport method as the threshold of motion were used. In each test, riprap transport rates were measured at different time intervals using a sediment trap. Results reveal that incipient motion conditions of transverse (cross-sectional) protections are strongly influenced by both the protrusion and length of bed protection, which indicates that stability significantly increases as protection length increases and decreases as protrusion increases. In the case of longitudinal protections, almost the same failure conditions were found as in the case of continuous protection. Furthermore, these conditions are unrelated to the width of the protection. A coefficient to correct design formulas obtained by other authors is proposed to take into account the effect of the geometry of transverse protections on their stability
de Almeida, Gustavo A. M.
f6edffc1-7bb3-443f-8829-e471b6514a7e
Martin-Vide, Juan P.
2587a91c-bc62-4602-bc31-4833fcb1ad9b
de Almeida, Gustavo A. M.
f6edffc1-7bb3-443f-8829-e471b6514a7e
Martin-Vide, Juan P.
2587a91c-bc62-4602-bc31-4833fcb1ad9b

de Almeida, Gustavo A. M. and Martin-Vide, Juan P. (2011) Fluvial stability of a transverse vs. a longitudinal riprap protection. Tecnología y ciencias del Agua.

Record type: Article

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted in a laboratory to determine the influence of length, width, and protrusion of non-continuous riprap protections on shear failure conditions. The incipient motion of particles as a failure criterion and the reference transport method as the threshold of motion were used. In each test, riprap transport rates were measured at different time intervals using a sediment trap. Results reveal that incipient motion conditions of transverse (cross-sectional) protections are strongly influenced by both the protrusion and length of bed protection, which indicates that stability significantly increases as protection length increases and decreases as protrusion increases. In the case of longitudinal protections, almost the same failure conditions were found as in the case of continuous protection. Furthermore, these conditions are unrelated to the width of the protection. A coefficient to correct design formulas obtained by other authors is proposed to take into account the effect of the geometry of transverse protections on their stability

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2011
Organisations: Water & Environmental Engineering Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 356425
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356425
PURE UUID: a0104783-7d05-4fa0-8e4c-5127eb18b809
ORCID for Gustavo A. M. de Almeida: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-3985

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Sep 2013 13:39
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 03:21

Export record

Contributors

Author: Juan P. Martin-Vide

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×