Valuing the flexibility of alternative sources of power generation
Valuing the flexibility of alternative sources of power generation
Solar and other renewable technologies can provide increments to an existing energy system which are small in capacity with a short lead time. Such power generation units provide more flexibility in incremental provision than large, long lead time units such as nuclear power stations. However, small, short lead time units are not normally given explicit credit for the flexibility these attributes provide. This additional flexibility can be valued by assessing the costs arising from the relative inflexibility of large, long lead time units. Numerical examples illustrate the proposed approach and the scale of the values involved. Failure to consider such values provides a built-in bias against the selection of sources of energy available as units with a small capacity, short lead time, and other flexibility attributes, including mobility and modularity. The approach outlined in this paper can eliminate this bias in a manner which is transparent and open to effective sensitivity analysis.
renewables, selection bias, flexibility
129-136
Chapman, Chris
a4f4805b-b67d-4c4c-856b-78e01a2c89a0
Ward, Stephen
ac1bf683-4186-44e7-9f5e-4193ee4d03cd
1996
Chapman, Chris
a4f4805b-b67d-4c4c-856b-78e01a2c89a0
Ward, Stephen
ac1bf683-4186-44e7-9f5e-4193ee4d03cd
Chapman, Chris and Ward, Stephen
(1996)
Valuing the flexibility of alternative sources of power generation.
Energy Policy, 24 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/0301-4215(95)00078-X).
Abstract
Solar and other renewable technologies can provide increments to an existing energy system which are small in capacity with a short lead time. Such power generation units provide more flexibility in incremental provision than large, long lead time units such as nuclear power stations. However, small, short lead time units are not normally given explicit credit for the flexibility these attributes provide. This additional flexibility can be valued by assessing the costs arising from the relative inflexibility of large, long lead time units. Numerical examples illustrate the proposed approach and the scale of the values involved. Failure to consider such values provides a built-in bias against the selection of sources of energy available as units with a small capacity, short lead time, and other flexibility attributes, including mobility and modularity. The approach outlined in this paper can eliminate this bias in a manner which is transparent and open to effective sensitivity analysis.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1996
Keywords:
renewables, selection bias, flexibility
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 35679
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35679
ISSN: 0301-4215
PURE UUID: 475eb7b1-b482-402e-b8b0-cae05c5dc3d5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:53
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Stephen Ward
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics