Social networks, the ‘Work’ and work force of chronic illness self-management: a survey analysis of personal communities
Social networks, the ‘Work’ and work force of chronic illness self-management: a survey analysis of personal communities
Self-management support forms a central aspect of chronic Illness management nationally and globally. Evidence for the success of self-management support has mainly focussed on individually-centred outcomes of behavioural change. While it is recognised that social network members play an important role there is currently a gap in knowledge regarding who provides what type of support and under what circumstances. This is relevant for understanding the division of labour and the meeting of needs for those living with a long-term condition. We therefore took a network approach to explore self-management support conceptualising it as types of illness ‘work’ undertaken within peoples’ social networks. 300 people from deprived areas and with chronic illnesses took part in a survey conducted in 2010 in the North West of England. A concentric circles diagram was used as a research tool with which participants identified 2,544 network members who contributed to illness management. The results provide an articulation of how social network members are substantially involved in illness management. Whilst partners and close family make the highest contributions there is evidence of inputs from a wide range of relationships. Network member characteristics (type of relationship, proximity, frequency of contact) impact on the amount of illness work undertaken in peoples’ networks. In networks with ‘no partner’ other people tend to contribute more in the way of illness related work than in networks with a partner. This indicates a degree of substitutability between differently constituted networks, and that the level and type of input by different members of a network might change according to circumstances. A network perspective offers an opportunity to redress the balance of an exclusively individual focus on self-management because it addresses the broader set of contributions and resources available to people in need of chronic illness management and support
e59723
Vassilev, I.
d76a5531-4ddc-4eb2-909b-a2a1068f05f3
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Blickem, Christian
cc3228ac-f56e-4dca-9aae-cbb6bfac4fb3
Brooks, Helen
0056a0c8-f97a-4215-99e1-652291fcd6eb
Kapadia, Dharmi
1adf5ad0-bcf5-4776-9e18-05e0b8f5395e
Kennedy, Anne
e059c1c7-d6d0-41c8-95e1-95e5273b07f8
Sanders, Caroline
1121a9ec-e719-489a-9ffd-ae8cb6e49a78
Kirk, Sue
bb78bede-b432-48d9-baef-9a317805f55d
Reeves, David
4d9f4b50-445c-4257-81fe-4d6fa73a9891
2013
Vassilev, I.
d76a5531-4ddc-4eb2-909b-a2a1068f05f3
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Blickem, Christian
cc3228ac-f56e-4dca-9aae-cbb6bfac4fb3
Brooks, Helen
0056a0c8-f97a-4215-99e1-652291fcd6eb
Kapadia, Dharmi
1adf5ad0-bcf5-4776-9e18-05e0b8f5395e
Kennedy, Anne
e059c1c7-d6d0-41c8-95e1-95e5273b07f8
Sanders, Caroline
1121a9ec-e719-489a-9ffd-ae8cb6e49a78
Kirk, Sue
bb78bede-b432-48d9-baef-9a317805f55d
Reeves, David
4d9f4b50-445c-4257-81fe-4d6fa73a9891
Vassilev, I., Rogers, Anne, Blickem, Christian, Brooks, Helen, Kapadia, Dharmi, Kennedy, Anne, Sanders, Caroline, Kirk, Sue and Reeves, David
(2013)
Social networks, the ‘Work’ and work force of chronic illness self-management: a survey analysis of personal communities.
PLoS ONE, 8 (4), .
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059723).
Abstract
Self-management support forms a central aspect of chronic Illness management nationally and globally. Evidence for the success of self-management support has mainly focussed on individually-centred outcomes of behavioural change. While it is recognised that social network members play an important role there is currently a gap in knowledge regarding who provides what type of support and under what circumstances. This is relevant for understanding the division of labour and the meeting of needs for those living with a long-term condition. We therefore took a network approach to explore self-management support conceptualising it as types of illness ‘work’ undertaken within peoples’ social networks. 300 people from deprived areas and with chronic illnesses took part in a survey conducted in 2010 in the North West of England. A concentric circles diagram was used as a research tool with which participants identified 2,544 network members who contributed to illness management. The results provide an articulation of how social network members are substantially involved in illness management. Whilst partners and close family make the highest contributions there is evidence of inputs from a wide range of relationships. Network member characteristics (type of relationship, proximity, frequency of contact) impact on the amount of illness work undertaken in peoples’ networks. In networks with ‘no partner’ other people tend to contribute more in the way of illness related work than in networks with a partner. This indicates a degree of substitutability between differently constituted networks, and that the level and type of input by different members of a network might change according to circumstances. A network perspective offers an opportunity to redress the balance of an exclusively individual focus on self-management because it addresses the broader set of contributions and resources available to people in need of chronic illness management and support
Text
Social Networks, the ‘Work’ and Work Force of Chronic Illness Self-Management A Survey Analysis of Personal Communities.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 2013
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 356942
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/356942
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 1e346899-875c-4a45-9282-d0b7b460a6f8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Sep 2013 15:28
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Christian Blickem
Author:
Helen Brooks
Author:
Dharmi Kapadia
Author:
Anne Kennedy
Author:
Caroline Sanders
Author:
Sue Kirk
Author:
David Reeves
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics