Automatic detection and classification of odontocete whistles
Automatic detection and classification of odontocete whistles
Methods for the fully automatic detection and species classification of odontocete whistles are described. The detector applies a number of noise cancellation techniques to a spectrogram of sound data and then searches for connected regions of data which rise above a pre-determined threshold. When tested on a dataset of recordings which had been carefully annotated by a human operator, the detector was able to detect (recall) 79.6% of human identified sounds that had a signal-to-noise ratio above 10?dB, with 88% of the detections being valid. A significant problem with automatic detectors is that they tend to partially detect whistles or break whistles into several parts. A classifier has been developed specifically to work with fragmented whistle detections. By accumulating statistics over many whistle fragments, correct classification rates of over 94% have been achieved for four species. The success rate is, however, heavily dependent on the number of species included in the classifier mix, with the mean correct classification rate dropping to 58.5% when 12 species were included
acoustic signal detection, acoustic signal processing, bioacoustics, biocommunications, signal classification, signal denoising
2427-2437
Gillespie, Douglas
bd154eb4-02b9-485f-8b14-331398eec520
Caillat, Majolaine
a0ff9949-2b4a-4134-9aba-cc7682261874
Gordon, Jonathan
ebaf0f57-b200-4d62-a7d5-dfcbd596d00f
White, P.R.
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
September 2013
Gillespie, Douglas
bd154eb4-02b9-485f-8b14-331398eec520
Caillat, Majolaine
a0ff9949-2b4a-4134-9aba-cc7682261874
Gordon, Jonathan
ebaf0f57-b200-4d62-a7d5-dfcbd596d00f
White, P.R.
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
Gillespie, Douglas, Caillat, Majolaine, Gordon, Jonathan and White, P.R.
(2013)
Automatic detection and classification of odontocete whistles.
[in special issue: Methods for Marine Mammals Passive Acoustics]
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134 (3), .
(doi:10.1121/1.4816555).
Abstract
Methods for the fully automatic detection and species classification of odontocete whistles are described. The detector applies a number of noise cancellation techniques to a spectrogram of sound data and then searches for connected regions of data which rise above a pre-determined threshold. When tested on a dataset of recordings which had been carefully annotated by a human operator, the detector was able to detect (recall) 79.6% of human identified sounds that had a signal-to-noise ratio above 10?dB, with 88% of the detections being valid. A significant problem with automatic detectors is that they tend to partially detect whistles or break whistles into several parts. A classifier has been developed specifically to work with fragmented whistle detections. By accumulating statistics over many whistle fragments, correct classification rates of over 94% have been achieved for four species. The success rate is, however, heavily dependent on the number of species included in the classifier mix, with the mean correct classification rate dropping to 58.5% when 12 species were included
Other
GetPDFServlet_filetype=pdf&id=JASMAN000134000003002427000001&idtype=cvips&doi=10.1121%2F1.4816555&prog=normal
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: September 2013
Keywords:
acoustic signal detection, acoustic signal processing, bioacoustics, biocommunications, signal classification, signal denoising
Organisations:
Signal Processing & Control Grp
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 357466
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/357466
ISSN: 0001-4966
PURE UUID: db87b909-b4f3-415f-9f35-5e94207e4f61
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Oct 2013 14:17
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 01:33
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Douglas Gillespie
Author:
Majolaine Caillat
Author:
Jonathan Gordon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics