A comparison of surface features on submerged and non-submerged bone using scanning electron microscopy
A comparison of surface features on submerged and non-submerged bone using scanning electron microscopy
Skeletal remains are excellent sources of information regarding the deceased individual and the taphonomic history of their body. However, the accuracy of this information is governed by our ability to interpret features on the surface of a bone. Little research in this respect has been carried out on remains found in aquatic environments. This study compares damage features created on the surface of modern and archaeological bone found in a seawater environment, to surface features present on unmodified bone, archaeological bone, pathological bone and burned bone. Results show that no similarities with regard to surface pores were identified between submerged modern bone and archaeological, pathological and burned bone. Similarities were seen between submerged and dry archaeological bones. Thus it is argued that the misinterpretation of the taphonomic history of isolated bones recovered from bodies of water should be avoidable in the forensic context.
Forensic anthropology, Taphonomy, Bone, Sediment transport, Aquatic environment, Scanning electron microscopy
770-776
DeBattista, R.
43b12898-f903-4029-8f56-a71e990ee19c
Thompson, T.J.U.
8b1a3243-3f5c-4460-8e1d-7af2bc447308
Thompson, C.E.L.
2a304aa6-761e-4d99-b227-cedb67129bfb
Gowland, R.L.
42a017cd-908d-400b-87ed-a91f1f56e251
August 2013
DeBattista, R.
43b12898-f903-4029-8f56-a71e990ee19c
Thompson, T.J.U.
8b1a3243-3f5c-4460-8e1d-7af2bc447308
Thompson, C.E.L.
2a304aa6-761e-4d99-b227-cedb67129bfb
Gowland, R.L.
42a017cd-908d-400b-87ed-a91f1f56e251
DeBattista, R., Thompson, T.J.U., Thompson, C.E.L. and Gowland, R.L.
(2013)
A comparison of surface features on submerged and non-submerged bone using scanning electron microscopy.
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 20 (6), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.037).
Abstract
Skeletal remains are excellent sources of information regarding the deceased individual and the taphonomic history of their body. However, the accuracy of this information is governed by our ability to interpret features on the surface of a bone. Little research in this respect has been carried out on remains found in aquatic environments. This study compares damage features created on the surface of modern and archaeological bone found in a seawater environment, to surface features present on unmodified bone, archaeological bone, pathological bone and burned bone. Results show that no similarities with regard to surface pores were identified between submerged modern bone and archaeological, pathological and burned bone. Similarities were seen between submerged and dry archaeological bones. Thus it is argued that the misinterpretation of the taphonomic history of isolated bones recovered from bodies of water should be avoidable in the forensic context.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: August 2013
Keywords:
Forensic anthropology, Taphonomy, Bone, Sediment transport, Aquatic environment, Scanning electron microscopy
Organisations:
Geology & Geophysics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 358544
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/358544
ISSN: 1752-928X
PURE UUID: 489168c7-a231-48cd-8d24-ad35d39fc475
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Oct 2013 10:39
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R. DeBattista
Author:
T.J.U. Thompson
Author:
R.L. Gowland
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics