Financial Markets can go mad : Evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble
Financial Markets can go mad : Evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble
This paper explores investor behaviour during the South Sea Bubble—the first major speculative boom and bust on the stock markets. Previous literature debates whether investors during this episode acted rationally. Newly acquired data involving parallel markets for the South Sea Company's stock and subscription receipts are analysed, and widening valuation gaps are observed between these substitutable financial instruments. Rational explanations do not prove adequate, and the anomalies are explained by the biased decision-making of investors, and their tendency to view financial markets as wagering markets. The implications of these findings for the current debate on rationality in financial markets are identified.
233-271
Dale, R.S.
b637fb4c-899e-4bec-82a4-0b2ca795f7c7
Johnson, J.E.V.
6d9f1a51-38a8-4011-a792-bfc82040fac4
Tang, L.
fbb8bd41-4a42-470b-956a-9c030f56887d
2005
Dale, R.S.
b637fb4c-899e-4bec-82a4-0b2ca795f7c7
Johnson, J.E.V.
6d9f1a51-38a8-4011-a792-bfc82040fac4
Tang, L.
fbb8bd41-4a42-470b-956a-9c030f56887d
Dale, R.S., Johnson, J.E.V. and Tang, L.
(2005)
Financial Markets can go mad : Evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble.
The Economic History Review, 58 (2), .
(doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2005.00304.x).
Abstract
This paper explores investor behaviour during the South Sea Bubble—the first major speculative boom and bust on the stock markets. Previous literature debates whether investors during this episode acted rationally. Newly acquired data involving parallel markets for the South Sea Company's stock and subscription receipts are analysed, and widening valuation gaps are observed between these substitutable financial instruments. Rational explanations do not prove adequate, and the anomalies are explained by the biased decision-making of investors, and their tendency to view financial markets as wagering markets. The implications of these findings for the current debate on rationality in financial markets are identified.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 35855
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35855
ISSN: 0013-0117
PURE UUID: be211af1-6616-4fe4-95b6-9f2dce5c96ce
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:54
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R.S. Dale
Author:
J.E.V. Johnson
Author:
L. Tang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics