A comparative analysis of ordinary, conditional, ordered and exploded logic: their impact in determining bias in market or state contingent claims
A comparative analysis of ordinary, conditional, ordered and exploded logic: their impact in determining bias in market or state contingent claims
University of Southampton
Johnson, J.E.V.
6d9f1a51-38a8-4011-a792-bfc82040fac4
O'Brien, R.
bfc31021-cd61-45c0-b02b-3f013e1bd34d
Johnson, J.E.V.
6d9f1a51-38a8-4011-a792-bfc82040fac4
O'Brien, R.
bfc31021-cd61-45c0-b02b-3f013e1bd34d
Johnson, J.E.V. and O'Brien, R.
(2006)
A comparative analysis of ordinary, conditional, ordered and exploded logic: their impact in determining bias in market or state contingent claims
(Discussion Papers in Accounting & Finance)
Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton
(Submitted)
Record type:
Monograph
(Discussion Paper)
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Submitted date: 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 35856
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35856
PURE UUID: 94d99ea3-445d-4a09-affc-5cfc109fc32a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jan 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:30
Export record
Contributors
Author:
J.E.V. Johnson
Author:
R. O'Brien
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics