Evaluation of different machine learning methods for land cover mapping of a Mediterranean area using multi-seasonal landsat images and digital terrain models
Evaluation of different machine learning methods for land cover mapping of a Mediterranean area using multi-seasonal landsat images and digital terrain models
Land cover monitoring using digital Earth data requires robust classification methods that allow the accurate mapping of complex land cover categories. This paper discusses the crucial issues related to the application of different up-to-date machine learning classifiers: classification trees (CT), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM) and random forest (RF). The analysis of the statistical significance of the differences between the performance of these algorithms, as well as sensitivity to data set size reduction and noise were also analysed. Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper data captured in European spring and summer were used with auxiliary variables derived from a digital terrain model to classify 14 different land cover categories in south Spain. Overall, statistically similar accuracies of over 91% were obtained for ANN, SVM and RF. However, the findings of this study show differences in the accuracy of the classifiers, being RF the most accurate classifier with a very simple parameterization. SVM, followed by RF, was the most robust classifier to noise and data reduction. Significant differences in their performances were only reached for thresholds of noise and data reduction greater than 20% (noise, SVM) and 25% (noise, RF), and 80% (reduction, SVM) and 50% (reduction, RF), respectively.
492-509
Rodriguez Galiano, Victor F.
88495556-2795-456d-b972-31ca79fe4a71
Chica-Rivas, Mario
50b8d1b4-46e5-4a28-849f-03731e227166
2014
Rodriguez Galiano, Victor F.
88495556-2795-456d-b972-31ca79fe4a71
Chica-Rivas, Mario
50b8d1b4-46e5-4a28-849f-03731e227166
Rodriguez Galiano, Victor F. and Chica-Rivas, Mario
(2014)
Evaluation of different machine learning methods for land cover mapping of a Mediterranean area using multi-seasonal landsat images and digital terrain models.
International Journal of Digital Earth, 7 (6), .
(doi:10.1080/17538947.2012.748848).
Abstract
Land cover monitoring using digital Earth data requires robust classification methods that allow the accurate mapping of complex land cover categories. This paper discusses the crucial issues related to the application of different up-to-date machine learning classifiers: classification trees (CT), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM) and random forest (RF). The analysis of the statistical significance of the differences between the performance of these algorithms, as well as sensitivity to data set size reduction and noise were also analysed. Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper data captured in European spring and summer were used with auxiliary variables derived from a digital terrain model to classify 14 different land cover categories in south Spain. Overall, statistically similar accuracies of over 91% were obtained for ANN, SVM and RF. However, the findings of this study show differences in the accuracy of the classifiers, being RF the most accurate classifier with a very simple parameterization. SVM, followed by RF, was the most robust classifier to noise and data reduction. Significant differences in their performances were only reached for thresholds of noise and data reduction greater than 20% (noise, SVM) and 25% (noise, RF), and 80% (reduction, SVM) and 50% (reduction, RF), respectively.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2014
Organisations:
Global Env Change & Earth Observation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 360084
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/360084
ISSN: 1753-8947
PURE UUID: cac94533-dd32-4d50-9247-d81655d4cd6d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Nov 2013 13:38
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 15:33
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Victor F. Rodriguez Galiano
Author:
Mario Chica-Rivas
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics