The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The use of scrip dividends by UK companies

The use of scrip dividends by UK companies
The use of scrip dividends by UK companies
A UK company may give its shareholders the option to elect to receive additional shares in the company in lieu of a cash dividend. The share alternative is referred to as a scrip dividend. Scrip dividends offer tax savings to some UK companies, and may be beneficial to certain shareholders. The type of company that can benefit from scrip dividends is one that has structural surplus advance corporation tax (ACT). This may arise because the company distributes either foreign source profits or preference income (income that is subject to tax). There has been a decline in the number of companies with structural surplus ACT over the past ten years. This has been largely due to the reduction of preference income following the Finance Act of 1984. On the basis of the analysis presented in the paper it is expected that companies with structural surplus ACT will offer scrip dividends and, as the number of companies in this position has declined over the past decade, there will be a reduction in the number of companies offering scrip dividends. A company without structural surplus ACT obtains a timing benefit rather than a tax savings by offering scrip dividends. As there are costs in offering scrip dividends, it is expected that companies without structural surplus ACT will not offer scrip dividends. The results of the study show that the scrip dividends became popular amongst UK companies when fewer companies had preference income as the effect of the Finance Act of 1984. Also, contrary to expectations, companies without structural surplus ACT offer scrip dividends. Possible explanations for these results are discussed in the paper. The tax rules on scrip dividends make a scrip dividend equivalent to the value of the net cash dividend unattractive to some groups of shareholders. It is therefore expected that the take-up of the scrip alternative will be low. This is confirmed by the results of the study
95-98
University of Southampton
Casson, Peter
5ac137b1-dc94-41fb-82c5-736ad5be75c2
Oglivie, John
15e1b83c-771e-4392-9fca-e3965b0c7e0c
Casson, Peter
5ac137b1-dc94-41fb-82c5-736ad5be75c2
Oglivie, John
15e1b83c-771e-4392-9fca-e3965b0c7e0c

Casson, Peter and Oglivie, John (1995) The use of scrip dividends by UK companies (Discussion Papers in Accounting and Management Science, 95-98) Southampton, UK. University of Southampton 28pp.

Record type: Monograph (Discussion Paper)

Abstract

A UK company may give its shareholders the option to elect to receive additional shares in the company in lieu of a cash dividend. The share alternative is referred to as a scrip dividend. Scrip dividends offer tax savings to some UK companies, and may be beneficial to certain shareholders. The type of company that can benefit from scrip dividends is one that has structural surplus advance corporation tax (ACT). This may arise because the company distributes either foreign source profits or preference income (income that is subject to tax). There has been a decline in the number of companies with structural surplus ACT over the past ten years. This has been largely due to the reduction of preference income following the Finance Act of 1984. On the basis of the analysis presented in the paper it is expected that companies with structural surplus ACT will offer scrip dividends and, as the number of companies in this position has declined over the past decade, there will be a reduction in the number of companies offering scrip dividends. A company without structural surplus ACT obtains a timing benefit rather than a tax savings by offering scrip dividends. As there are costs in offering scrip dividends, it is expected that companies without structural surplus ACT will not offer scrip dividends. The results of the study show that the scrip dividends became popular amongst UK companies when fewer companies had preference income as the effect of the Finance Act of 1984. Also, contrary to expectations, companies without structural surplus ACT offer scrip dividends. Possible explanations for these results are discussed in the paper. The tax rules on scrip dividends make a scrip dividend equivalent to the value of the net cash dividend unattractive to some groups of shareholders. It is therefore expected that the take-up of the scrip alternative will be low. This is confirmed by the results of the study

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 1995

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 36063
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36063
PURE UUID: 820bcd72-699f-4729-a494-1cca799554eb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 May 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:31

Export record

Contributors

Author: Peter Casson
Author: John Oglivie

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×