The use of scrip dividends by UK companies
The use of scrip dividends by UK companies
A UK company may give its shareholders the option to elect to receive additional shares in the company in lieu of a cash dividend. The share alternative is referred to as a scrip dividend. Scrip dividends offer tax savings to some UK companies, and may be beneficial to certain shareholders. The type of company that can benefit from scrip dividends is one that has structural surplus advance corporation tax (ACT). This may arise because the company distributes either foreign source profits or preference income (income that is subject to tax). There has been a decline in the number of companies with structural surplus ACT over the past ten years. This has been largely due to the reduction of preference income following the Finance Act of 1984. On the basis of the analysis presented in the paper it is expected that companies with structural surplus ACT will offer scrip dividends and, as the number of companies in this position has declined over the past decade, there will be a reduction in the number of companies offering scrip dividends. A company without structural surplus ACT obtains a timing benefit rather than a tax savings by offering scrip dividends. As there are costs in offering scrip dividends, it is expected that companies without structural surplus ACT will not offer scrip dividends. The results of the study show that the scrip dividends became popular amongst UK companies when fewer companies had preference income as the effect of the Finance Act of 1984. Also, contrary to expectations, companies without structural surplus ACT offer scrip dividends. Possible explanations for these results are discussed in the paper. The tax rules on scrip dividends make a scrip dividend equivalent to the value of the net cash dividend unattractive to some groups of shareholders. It is therefore expected that the take-up of the scrip alternative will be low. This is confirmed by the results of the study
University of Southampton
Casson, Peter
5ac137b1-dc94-41fb-82c5-736ad5be75c2
Oglivie, John
15e1b83c-771e-4392-9fca-e3965b0c7e0c
January 1995
Casson, Peter
5ac137b1-dc94-41fb-82c5-736ad5be75c2
Oglivie, John
15e1b83c-771e-4392-9fca-e3965b0c7e0c
Casson, Peter and Oglivie, John
(1995)
The use of scrip dividends by UK companies
(Discussion Papers in Accounting and Management Science, 95-98)
Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton
28pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Discussion Paper)
Abstract
A UK company may give its shareholders the option to elect to receive additional shares in the company in lieu of a cash dividend. The share alternative is referred to as a scrip dividend. Scrip dividends offer tax savings to some UK companies, and may be beneficial to certain shareholders. The type of company that can benefit from scrip dividends is one that has structural surplus advance corporation tax (ACT). This may arise because the company distributes either foreign source profits or preference income (income that is subject to tax). There has been a decline in the number of companies with structural surplus ACT over the past ten years. This has been largely due to the reduction of preference income following the Finance Act of 1984. On the basis of the analysis presented in the paper it is expected that companies with structural surplus ACT will offer scrip dividends and, as the number of companies in this position has declined over the past decade, there will be a reduction in the number of companies offering scrip dividends. A company without structural surplus ACT obtains a timing benefit rather than a tax savings by offering scrip dividends. As there are costs in offering scrip dividends, it is expected that companies without structural surplus ACT will not offer scrip dividends. The results of the study show that the scrip dividends became popular amongst UK companies when fewer companies had preference income as the effect of the Finance Act of 1984. Also, contrary to expectations, companies without structural surplus ACT offer scrip dividends. Possible explanations for these results are discussed in the paper. The tax rules on scrip dividends make a scrip dividend equivalent to the value of the net cash dividend unattractive to some groups of shareholders. It is therefore expected that the take-up of the scrip alternative will be low. This is confirmed by the results of the study
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 1995
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 36063
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36063
PURE UUID: 820bcd72-699f-4729-a494-1cca799554eb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 May 2007
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:31
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Peter Casson
Author:
John Oglivie
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics