The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

‘Many hands make light work’ or ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’? Achieving the tricky balance of appropriate involvement in palliative care for cancer

‘Many hands make light work’ or ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’? Achieving the tricky balance of appropriate involvement in palliative care for cancer
‘Many hands make light work’ or ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’? Achieving the tricky balance of appropriate involvement in palliative care for cancer
Background Addressing the care needs of people with advanced cancer is often complex, requiring communication between different professional and lay care providers, across different geographical and professional boundaries. Achieving the right balance of support and autonomy can be difficult, needing to be tailored to each patient.

Aim Identify and quantify the number of people involved in the care of people with cancer and palliative care needs, and explore the network of communication pathways between these different people.

Method Case study methodology was employed, each case involving one patient and the (patient-identified) people involved in their care (PIPCs) within the past 6 months. During indepth interviews with patients (n=24; mean length 65 min) and PIPCs (n=100; mean length 30 min), respondents identified and described the network of communication pathways surrounding the patient's care. A map of each patient's care network was drawn during each interview, and was subsequently redrawn using social networking software.

Results Patients (15 female, 9 male; age range: 48–85) had a range of primary tumours (mean time since diagnosis: 9.5 months; range: 0.5–61 months). All were described as receiving or needing specialist or generalist palliative care at the time of recruitment (through General Practice (n=5); Hospital Specialist Palliative Care Team (n=8); Specialist Palliative Care Unit (n=11)). Patients identified 9–45 (mean:26) different people/teams as being involved in their care; an average of six PIPCs per case (range:0–11) were subsequently interviewed about their contribution to the communication surrounding this patient.

Conclusion Sample cases and selected communication maps are presented to illustrate the range of possibilities in numbers of PIPCs involved and the complexity of, and patient and PIPC satisfaction with, some patients' communication networks. The methodological utility of the mapping technique, and its potential contribution to achieving the right balance of involvement in palliative care, are considered.
2045-435X
A46-A47
Porter, Katerina
09240a8a-b802-411c-84b7-022c156144e3
Jarrett, Nikki
2127f54c-9a95-4b04-a7f4-c1da8b21b378
Addington-Hall, Julia
87560cc4-7562-4f9b-b908-81f3b603fdd8
Corner, Jessica
eddc9d69-aa12-4de5-8ab0-b20a6b5765fa
Lathlean, Judith
98a74375-c265-47d2-b75b-5f0f3e14c1a9
Porter, Katerina
09240a8a-b802-411c-84b7-022c156144e3
Jarrett, Nikki
2127f54c-9a95-4b04-a7f4-c1da8b21b378
Addington-Hall, Julia
87560cc4-7562-4f9b-b908-81f3b603fdd8
Corner, Jessica
eddc9d69-aa12-4de5-8ab0-b20a6b5765fa
Lathlean, Judith
98a74375-c265-47d2-b75b-5f0f3e14c1a9

Porter, Katerina, Jarrett, Nikki, Addington-Hall, Julia, Corner, Jessica and Lathlean, Judith (2012) ‘Many hands make light work’ or ‘too many cooks spoil the broth’? Achieving the tricky balance of appropriate involvement in palliative care for cancer. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2 (Suppl 1), A46-A47. (doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000196.134).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background Addressing the care needs of people with advanced cancer is often complex, requiring communication between different professional and lay care providers, across different geographical and professional boundaries. Achieving the right balance of support and autonomy can be difficult, needing to be tailored to each patient.

Aim Identify and quantify the number of people involved in the care of people with cancer and palliative care needs, and explore the network of communication pathways between these different people.

Method Case study methodology was employed, each case involving one patient and the (patient-identified) people involved in their care (PIPCs) within the past 6 months. During indepth interviews with patients (n=24; mean length 65 min) and PIPCs (n=100; mean length 30 min), respondents identified and described the network of communication pathways surrounding the patient's care. A map of each patient's care network was drawn during each interview, and was subsequently redrawn using social networking software.

Results Patients (15 female, 9 male; age range: 48–85) had a range of primary tumours (mean time since diagnosis: 9.5 months; range: 0.5–61 months). All were described as receiving or needing specialist or generalist palliative care at the time of recruitment (through General Practice (n=5); Hospital Specialist Palliative Care Team (n=8); Specialist Palliative Care Unit (n=11)). Patients identified 9–45 (mean:26) different people/teams as being involved in their care; an average of six PIPCs per case (range:0–11) were subsequently interviewed about their contribution to the communication surrounding this patient.

Conclusion Sample cases and selected communication maps are presented to illustrate the range of possibilities in numbers of PIPCs involved and the complexity of, and patient and PIPC satisfaction with, some patients' communication networks. The methodological utility of the mapping technique, and its potential contribution to achieving the right balance of involvement in palliative care, are considered.

Slideshow
__filestore_users_nj1_mydocuments_H Drive_research_dimbleby cancer care_dissemination_porter et al 9th palliative care congress many hands.pptx - Other
Download (572kB)

More information

Published date: March 2012
Additional Information: Poster presented at Cancer Care Congress, Gateshead 2012. Planning care: Poster no. 94
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 360705
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/360705
ISSN: 2045-435X
PURE UUID: 2ccc9038-d632-4ff4-ae8a-f4a44ac46f6c
ORCID for Nikki Jarrett: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-8113

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jan 2014 11:28
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 00:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Katerina Porter
Author: Nikki Jarrett ORCID iD
Author: Jessica Corner
Author: Judith Lathlean

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×