Coordination of symmetrical and asymmetrical human gait
Coordination of symmetrical and asymmetrical human gait
Most human gait forms assume symmetrical, alternating patterns of interlimb coordination (e.g., crawling, walking, running). Human galloping is a notable exception. In contrast to extensive information on galloping in animals, little is known about this gait in humans. Therefore, kinematic and topographical analyses of running and galloping were undertaken to investigate the manner in which the lower limbs are uncoupled to produce this asymmetrical gait. Seven adult females were filmed while running and galloping at their preferred speed. Analysis of the gaits revealed differences in the following: (a) preferred speed, (b) coupling between upper- and lower-limb girdles, and (c) point of foot fall (end-point trajectories). In contrast to clear differences in interlimb coordination, intralimb coordination was remarkably similar across gaits, although when galloping was adopted, the rear leg did show more variable change than the front leg
339-353
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Caldwell, Graham E.
eb06abbe-1221-4c2a-a210-e8b451663074
1992
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Caldwell, Graham E.
eb06abbe-1221-4c2a-a210-e8b451663074
Whitall, Jill and Caldwell, Graham E.
(1992)
Coordination of symmetrical and asymmetrical human gait.
Journal of Motor Behavior, 24 (4), .
(doi:10.1080/00222895.1992.9941630).
Abstract
Most human gait forms assume symmetrical, alternating patterns of interlimb coordination (e.g., crawling, walking, running). Human galloping is a notable exception. In contrast to extensive information on galloping in animals, little is known about this gait in humans. Therefore, kinematic and topographical analyses of running and galloping were undertaken to investigate the manner in which the lower limbs are uncoupled to produce this asymmetrical gait. Seven adult females were filmed while running and galloping at their preferred speed. Analysis of the gaits revealed differences in the following: (a) preferred speed, (b) coupling between upper- and lower-limb girdles, and (c) point of foot fall (end-point trajectories). In contrast to clear differences in interlimb coordination, intralimb coordination was remarkably similar across gaits, although when galloping was adopted, the rear leg did show more variable change than the front leg
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1992
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 360756
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/360756
ISSN: 0022-2895
PURE UUID: afecbf70-ad43-41aa-89df-84c9b5e43e66
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Dec 2013 09:11
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 15:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jill Whitall
Author:
Graham E. Caldwell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics