The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The effect of nonspecific task constraints on quadrupedal locomotion: I. Interlimb coordination

The effect of nonspecific task constraints on quadrupedal locomotion: I. Interlimb coordination
The effect of nonspecific task constraints on quadrupedal locomotion: I. Interlimb coordination
The present study examined the effect of nonspecific task constraints on the multilimb coordination task of preferred-speed crawling. Adult subjects undertook three trials each of the following randomly ordered conditions: forward prone (FP), backward supine (BS), backward prone (BP) and forward supine (FS). Subjects adopted specific coordinative solutions consistent with task-related function rather than anatomical specification. The patterns were relatively stable, with BP being least stable. Across conditions, subjects changed their velocity in a predictable order that corresponded to the various constraints. These velocity changes were largely attributable to stride length adjustments and not limb frequency. Within a condition, neither velocity nor anthropometrics appeared to influence the coordinative solution. Overall, rather large differences were found in coordinative solutions, possibly owing to the nature of the tasks and/or individual searching strategies. The results were interpretable within a dynamic approach to coordination and support the idea that coordination is functionally rather than anatomically determined
1087-1640
138-160
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Forrester, Larry
f4cb091c-9475-40df-a515-0207765cecf9
Getchell, Nancy
ad8930a7-1a17-4c02-941a-cbe52984277f
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Forrester, Larry
f4cb091c-9475-40df-a515-0207765cecf9
Getchell, Nancy
ad8930a7-1a17-4c02-941a-cbe52984277f

Whitall, Jill, Forrester, Larry and Getchell, Nancy (1997) The effect of nonspecific task constraints on quadrupedal locomotion: I. Interlimb coordination. Motor Control, 1 (2), 138-160.

Record type: Article

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of nonspecific task constraints on the multilimb coordination task of preferred-speed crawling. Adult subjects undertook three trials each of the following randomly ordered conditions: forward prone (FP), backward supine (BS), backward prone (BP) and forward supine (FS). Subjects adopted specific coordinative solutions consistent with task-related function rather than anatomical specification. The patterns were relatively stable, with BP being least stable. Across conditions, subjects changed their velocity in a predictable order that corresponded to the various constraints. These velocity changes were largely attributable to stride length adjustments and not limb frequency. Within a condition, neither velocity nor anthropometrics appeared to influence the coordinative solution. Overall, rather large differences were found in coordinative solutions, possibly owing to the nature of the tasks and/or individual searching strategies. The results were interpretable within a dynamic approach to coordination and support the idea that coordination is functionally rather than anatomically determined

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1997
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 360776
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/360776
ISSN: 1087-1640
PURE UUID: d1d7de45-1469-4bf5-a090-6a156bde859a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Dec 2013 15:28
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 12:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jill Whitall
Author: Larry Forrester
Author: Nancy Getchell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×