Statistical models for spatially explicit biological data
Statistical models for spatially explicit biological data
Existing algorithms for predicting species' distributions sit on a continuum between purely statistical and purely biological approaches. Most of the existing algorithms are aspatial because they do not consider the spatial context, the occurrence of the species or conditions conducive to the species' existence, in neighbouring areas. The geostatistical techniques of kriging and cokriging are presented in an attempt to encourage biologists more frequently to consider them. Unlike deterministic spatial techniques they provide estimates of prediction errors. The assumptions and applications of common geostatistical techniques are presented with worked examples drawn from a dataset of the bluetongue outbreak in northwest Europe in 2006. Emphasis is placed on the importance and interpretation of weights in geostatistical calculations. Covarying environmental data may be used to improve predictions of species' distributions, but only if their sampling frequency is greater than that of the species' or disease data. Cokriging techniques are unable to determine the biological significance or importance of such environmental data, because they are not designed to do so.
species' distribution models
kriging
cokriging
variograms
bluetongue
species distribution models
bluetongue virus serotype-8
north-western europe
geostatistical approach
disease
distributions
variogram
accuracy
epidemic
ecology
1852-1869
Rogers, D. J.
658f04d4-bdb9-4ab2-bebb-539a94f85e99
Sedda, L.
ae6a74e0-ff67-4678-aefc-9976179294f6
2012
Rogers, D. J.
658f04d4-bdb9-4ab2-bebb-539a94f85e99
Sedda, L.
ae6a74e0-ff67-4678-aefc-9976179294f6
Rogers, D. J. and Sedda, L.
(2012)
Statistical models for spatially explicit biological data.
Parasitology, 139 (14), .
(doi:10.1017/S0031182012001345).
Abstract
Existing algorithms for predicting species' distributions sit on a continuum between purely statistical and purely biological approaches. Most of the existing algorithms are aspatial because they do not consider the spatial context, the occurrence of the species or conditions conducive to the species' existence, in neighbouring areas. The geostatistical techniques of kriging and cokriging are presented in an attempt to encourage biologists more frequently to consider them. Unlike deterministic spatial techniques they provide estimates of prediction errors. The assumptions and applications of common geostatistical techniques are presented with worked examples drawn from a dataset of the bluetongue outbreak in northwest Europe in 2006. Emphasis is placed on the importance and interpretation of weights in geostatistical calculations. Covarying environmental data may be used to improve predictions of species' distributions, but only if their sampling frequency is greater than that of the species' or disease data. Cokriging techniques are unable to determine the biological significance or importance of such environmental data, because they are not designed to do so.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2012
Additional Information:
048IP
Times Cited:2
Cited References Count:80
Keywords:
species' distribution models
kriging
cokriging
variograms
bluetongue
species distribution models
bluetongue virus serotype-8
north-western europe
geostatistical approach
disease
distributions
variogram
accuracy
epidemic
ecology
Organisations:
Geography & Environment
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 361776
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/361776
ISSN: 0031-1820
PURE UUID: df90e2f9-3e08-4f69-82eb-548582b69954
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Feb 2014 11:19
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 15:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D. J. Rogers
Author:
L. Sedda
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics