Survey of patients' experiences and perceptions of care provided by nurse and pharmacist independent prescribers in primary care
Survey of patients' experiences and perceptions of care provided by nurse and pharmacist independent prescribers in primary care
Background
In the United Kingdom, nurses and pharmacists who have undertaken additional post-registration training can prescribe medicines for any medical condition within their competence (non-medical prescribers, NMPs), but little is known about patients' experiences and perceptions of this service.
Objective
to obtain feedback from primary care patients on the impact of prescribing by nurse independent prescribers (NIPs) and pharmacist independent prescribers (PIPs) on experiences of the consultation, the patient–professional relationship, access to medicines, quality of care, choice, knowledge, patient-reported adherence and control of their condition.
Design
Two cross-sectional postal surveys.
Setting and participants
Patients prescribed for by either NIPs or PIPs in six general practices from different regions in England.
Results
30% of patients responded (294/975; 149/525 NIPs; 145/450 PIPs). Most said they were very satisfied with their last visit (94%; 87%), they were told as much as they wanted to know about their medicines (88%; 80%), and felt the independent prescriber really understood their point of view (87%; 75%). They had a good relationship with (89%; 79%) and confidence in (84%; 77%) their NMP. When comparing NMP and doctor prescribing services, most patients reported no difference in their experience of care provided, including access to it, control of condition, support for adherence, quality and safety of care.
Discussion and conclusions
Patients had positive perceptions and experience from their NMP visit. NMPs were well received, and patients' responses indicated the establishment of rapport. They did not express a strong preference for care provided by either their non-medical or medical prescriber
non-medical prescribing, nurse independent prescriber, patient experience, pharmacist independent prescriber
1-15
Tinelli, Michela
2e4c3281-1836-475d-be90-c31d9020bd53
Blenkinsopp, Alison
12c72c8c-3d75-432f-9097-4776af11b5d1
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Smith, Alesha
a3abdb79-1a87-46c6-a4a4-ee364a9886dc
Chapman, Stephen R.
461749b7-fa9d-41c6-9267-22949f73dad7
June 2013
Tinelli, Michela
2e4c3281-1836-475d-be90-c31d9020bd53
Blenkinsopp, Alison
12c72c8c-3d75-432f-9097-4776af11b5d1
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Smith, Alesha
a3abdb79-1a87-46c6-a4a4-ee364a9886dc
Chapman, Stephen R.
461749b7-fa9d-41c6-9267-22949f73dad7
Tinelli, Michela, Blenkinsopp, Alison, Latter, Sue, Smith, Alesha and Chapman, Stephen R.
(2013)
Survey of patients' experiences and perceptions of care provided by nurse and pharmacist independent prescribers in primary care.
Health Expectations, .
(doi:10.1111/hex.12099).
(PMID:23789877)
Abstract
Background
In the United Kingdom, nurses and pharmacists who have undertaken additional post-registration training can prescribe medicines for any medical condition within their competence (non-medical prescribers, NMPs), but little is known about patients' experiences and perceptions of this service.
Objective
to obtain feedback from primary care patients on the impact of prescribing by nurse independent prescribers (NIPs) and pharmacist independent prescribers (PIPs) on experiences of the consultation, the patient–professional relationship, access to medicines, quality of care, choice, knowledge, patient-reported adherence and control of their condition.
Design
Two cross-sectional postal surveys.
Setting and participants
Patients prescribed for by either NIPs or PIPs in six general practices from different regions in England.
Results
30% of patients responded (294/975; 149/525 NIPs; 145/450 PIPs). Most said they were very satisfied with their last visit (94%; 87%), they were told as much as they wanted to know about their medicines (88%; 80%), and felt the independent prescriber really understood their point of view (87%; 75%). They had a good relationship with (89%; 79%) and confidence in (84%; 77%) their NMP. When comparing NMP and doctor prescribing services, most patients reported no difference in their experience of care provided, including access to it, control of condition, support for adherence, quality and safety of care.
Discussion and conclusions
Patients had positive perceptions and experience from their NMP visit. NMPs were well received, and patients' responses indicated the establishment of rapport. They did not express a strong preference for care provided by either their non-medical or medical prescriber
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: June 2013
Keywords:
non-medical prescribing, nurse independent prescriber, patient experience, pharmacist independent prescriber
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 362207
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/362207
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 6ea210b6-3050-47dc-bd2a-e53d62b9823d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Feb 2014 11:45
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Michela Tinelli
Author:
Alison Blenkinsopp
Author:
Alesha Smith
Author:
Stephen R. Chapman
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics