Malnutrition self-screening by using MUST in hospital outpatients: validity, reliability, and ease of use
Malnutrition self-screening by using MUST in hospital outpatients: validity, reliability, and ease of use
BACKGROUND: Although nutritional screening with a tool such as the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) is recommended for outpatients, staff are under pressure to undertake a variety of other tasks. Little attention has been paid to the validity of patient self-screening with MUST.
OBJECTIVE: This study in 205 outpatients with a mean (±SD) age of 55 ± 17 y (56% male) assessed the practicalities of self-screening, its agreement with screening undertaken by a trained health care professional (HCP), and its test-retest reliability.
DESIGN: After the participants provided consent, screening was undertaken by the patients themselves and then by a trained HCP who was unaware of the self-screening results. All patients completed an ease-of-use questionnaire. Test-retest reliability of self-screening was established in a subset of 60 patients.
RESULTS: A total of 19.6% of patients categorized themselves as "at risk" of malnutrition (9.8% medium, 9.8% high). For the 3-category classification of MUST (low, medium, high), agreement between self-screening and HCP screening was 90% (? = 0.70; SE = 0.058, P < 0.001). For the 2-category classification (low risk, medium + high risk), agreement was 93% (? = 0.78, SE = 0.057, P < 0.001). Disagreements were not systematically under- or overcategorized. Test-retest reliability was almost perfect (? = 0.94, P < 0.001). Most patients (71%) completed self-screening in <5 min. Patients found the tool easy or very easy to understand (96%) and complete (98%), with 94% reporting that they were happy to screen themselves.
CONCLUSION: Self-screening involving MUST in outpatients is acceptable to patients, user-friendly, reliable, and associated with good agreement with HCP screening.
1000-1007
Cawood, Abbie L.
4067d429-6ce8-4e50-b5f5-d8bf62aada79
Elia, Marinos
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Sharp, Sarah K.E.
5653ea62-0136-422d-aaa9-592c0b51ed4b
Stratton, Rebecca J.
c6a5ead1-3387-42e7-8bea-5ac7d969d87b
November 2012
Cawood, Abbie L.
4067d429-6ce8-4e50-b5f5-d8bf62aada79
Elia, Marinos
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Sharp, Sarah K.E.
5653ea62-0136-422d-aaa9-592c0b51ed4b
Stratton, Rebecca J.
c6a5ead1-3387-42e7-8bea-5ac7d969d87b
Cawood, Abbie L., Elia, Marinos, Sharp, Sarah K.E. and Stratton, Rebecca J.
(2012)
Malnutrition self-screening by using MUST in hospital outpatients: validity, reliability, and ease of use.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 96 (5), .
(doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.037853).
(PMID:23034963)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although nutritional screening with a tool such as the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) is recommended for outpatients, staff are under pressure to undertake a variety of other tasks. Little attention has been paid to the validity of patient self-screening with MUST.
OBJECTIVE: This study in 205 outpatients with a mean (±SD) age of 55 ± 17 y (56% male) assessed the practicalities of self-screening, its agreement with screening undertaken by a trained health care professional (HCP), and its test-retest reliability.
DESIGN: After the participants provided consent, screening was undertaken by the patients themselves and then by a trained HCP who was unaware of the self-screening results. All patients completed an ease-of-use questionnaire. Test-retest reliability of self-screening was established in a subset of 60 patients.
RESULTS: A total of 19.6% of patients categorized themselves as "at risk" of malnutrition (9.8% medium, 9.8% high). For the 3-category classification of MUST (low, medium, high), agreement between self-screening and HCP screening was 90% (? = 0.70; SE = 0.058, P < 0.001). For the 2-category classification (low risk, medium + high risk), agreement was 93% (? = 0.78, SE = 0.057, P < 0.001). Disagreements were not systematically under- or overcategorized. Test-retest reliability was almost perfect (? = 0.94, P < 0.001). Most patients (71%) completed self-screening in <5 min. Patients found the tool easy or very easy to understand (96%) and complete (98%), with 94% reporting that they were happy to screen themselves.
CONCLUSION: Self-screening involving MUST in outpatients is acceptable to patients, user-friendly, reliable, and associated with good agreement with HCP screening.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 October 2012
Published date: November 2012
Organisations:
Clinical & Experimental Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 362510
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/362510
ISSN: 0002-9165
PURE UUID: ad588ce4-557b-45fb-800a-43b375087fdf
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Feb 2014 10:11
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Abbie L. Cawood
Author:
Sarah K.E. Sharp
Author:
Rebecca J. Stratton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics