The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Small businesses in the recession: a follow-up study of new manufacturing firms in South Hampshire

Small businesses in the recession: a follow-up study of new manufacturing firms in South Hampshire
Small businesses in the recession: a follow-up study of new manufacturing firms in South Hampshire
The paper reports on a follow-up study, undertaken in mid 1983, of 52 new manufacturing firms in South Hampshire, all started since 1975, and which were originally interviewed in 1981 in a study of new firm formation (the results are presented in Discussion Paper No 13). The study therefore covers a two year period, 1981-1983, in which the economy was in a deep depression, having "bottomed out" following the steep fall in the level of economic activity in late 1979/1980. However, such adverse economic circumstances do not appear to have had as detrimental an impact on the panel of firms as might have been anticipated. Admittedly, 23% of the original group of firms had closed in the period between the two surveys, but some were already clearly in difficulty as a result of internal problems when first interviewed. Moreover, less than half of the surviving firms claimed to have been adversely affected by the recession. Indeed, as a group the panel of surviving firms is characterised by increases in turnover, floorspace and employment and improvements in the quality of premises, capital stock and technological sophistication - all supporting the notion of a company ' life cycle' model. However, changes in other dimensions of business development - notably management structure, markets and customers - tended to be quite limited. The panel is also characterised by increased variability in employment, with the upper quartile value increasing by a greater rate than the median on most indicators - a result of the rapid growth of the small number of 'high fliers' which have pulled further away from the majority of firms in the group. Moreover, it is this small group of 'highfliers' in the panel which has made the greatest contribution to employment generation and economic development. It is concluded that policy would achieve more substantive results by shifting from its present indiscriminate assistance to the small firm sector towards a more selective approach which attempts to encourage the creation of greater numbers of rapid growth firms.
25
University of Southampton
Mason, C.M.
2a9d28a6-74c8-444a-bb4f-dd45adf39a39
Mason, C.M.
2a9d28a6-74c8-444a-bb4f-dd45adf39a39

Mason, C.M. (1984) Small businesses in the recession: a follow-up study of new manufacturing firms in South Hampshire (Department of Geography Discussion papers, 25) Southampton, GB. University of Southampton 40pp.

Record type: Monograph (Discussion Paper)

Abstract

The paper reports on a follow-up study, undertaken in mid 1983, of 52 new manufacturing firms in South Hampshire, all started since 1975, and which were originally interviewed in 1981 in a study of new firm formation (the results are presented in Discussion Paper No 13). The study therefore covers a two year period, 1981-1983, in which the economy was in a deep depression, having "bottomed out" following the steep fall in the level of economic activity in late 1979/1980. However, such adverse economic circumstances do not appear to have had as detrimental an impact on the panel of firms as might have been anticipated. Admittedly, 23% of the original group of firms had closed in the period between the two surveys, but some were already clearly in difficulty as a result of internal problems when first interviewed. Moreover, less than half of the surviving firms claimed to have been adversely affected by the recession. Indeed, as a group the panel of surviving firms is characterised by increases in turnover, floorspace and employment and improvements in the quality of premises, capital stock and technological sophistication - all supporting the notion of a company ' life cycle' model. However, changes in other dimensions of business development - notably management structure, markets and customers - tended to be quite limited. The panel is also characterised by increased variability in employment, with the upper quartile value increasing by a greater rate than the median on most indicators - a result of the rapid growth of the small number of 'high fliers' which have pulled further away from the majority of firms in the group. Moreover, it is this small group of 'highfliers' in the panel which has made the greatest contribution to employment generation and economic development. It is concluded that policy would achieve more substantive results by shifting from its present indiscriminate assistance to the small firm sector towards a more selective approach which attempts to encourage the creation of greater numbers of rapid growth firms.

Text
84037743.pdf - Other
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: 1984
Organisations: Geography & Environment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 362709
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/362709
PURE UUID: a2fc014f-7826-42e5-a8f3-2cd24aa46fc5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Mar 2014 09:59
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:12

Export record

Contributors

Author: C.M. Mason

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×