Rescaling responsibilities and rights: the case of UNASUR health
Rescaling responsibilities and rights: the case of UNASUR health
Regionalism can be defined as an instance of policy making of cross-border formation advanced through institutional arrangements, bureaucracies, political motivations, and social mobilization. State and non-state actors engage in political projects to relocate the governance of a particular issue or policy domain beyond the scope of national politics. This is a process by which regional projects move from one level of policy deliberation, negotiation, and implementation to another in what Hameiri identified as region-building (Hameiri, 2012). In the vast research field of regionalism that has flourished since 1993, expectations of what regional governance can deliver, however, have been evaluated primarily in terms of economic and security governance (Mansfield and Solingen, 2010). While much has been written about economic integration, regional institutions, and security communities, a discussion of how significant other policy domains have been in the process of regionalism has lagged behind. Specifically, a rather neglected issue in the account of contemporary forms of regionalism has been the extent to which regional integration can promote social development. This has been particularly the case in the study of regionalism in the Americas, where regional motivations have often been defined by an unrelenting path of political economic projects, often marked by the reach of the US as a regional hegemon (Fawcett in Fawcett and Serrano, 2009; Tussie, 2009). This has not been simply a matter of academic neglect, but a consequence of a political decoupling of economic integration and social policies in regional governance. As in Europe, advancing a “social agenda” has often been undermined by the task of removing barriers to trade. However, while Europe saw efforts to build practices of social inclusion become institutionalized in the open method of coordination (OMC) in the 1990s (Scharpf, 2007), Latin America is now experiencing a “social turn” where regional cooperation is reconnecting with social policy-making beyond a rhetorical aspect (Grugel, 2005). This chapter analyses the place of social policy as a driver of current dynamics (re)defining region-building in South America.
978-1-4094-6959-9
Riggirozzi, Pia
ed3be4f8-37e7-46a2-8242-f6495d727c22
March 2014
Riggirozzi, Pia
ed3be4f8-37e7-46a2-8242-f6495d727c22
Riggirozzi, Pia
(2014)
Rescaling responsibilities and rights: the case of UNASUR health.
In,
Exploring the New South American Regionalism (NSAR).
(The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series)
Farnham, GB.
Ashgate Publishing.
(doi:10.4324/9781315581736).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
Regionalism can be defined as an instance of policy making of cross-border formation advanced through institutional arrangements, bureaucracies, political motivations, and social mobilization. State and non-state actors engage in political projects to relocate the governance of a particular issue or policy domain beyond the scope of national politics. This is a process by which regional projects move from one level of policy deliberation, negotiation, and implementation to another in what Hameiri identified as region-building (Hameiri, 2012). In the vast research field of regionalism that has flourished since 1993, expectations of what regional governance can deliver, however, have been evaluated primarily in terms of economic and security governance (Mansfield and Solingen, 2010). While much has been written about economic integration, regional institutions, and security communities, a discussion of how significant other policy domains have been in the process of regionalism has lagged behind. Specifically, a rather neglected issue in the account of contemporary forms of regionalism has been the extent to which regional integration can promote social development. This has been particularly the case in the study of regionalism in the Americas, where regional motivations have often been defined by an unrelenting path of political economic projects, often marked by the reach of the US as a regional hegemon (Fawcett in Fawcett and Serrano, 2009; Tussie, 2009). This has not been simply a matter of academic neglect, but a consequence of a political decoupling of economic integration and social policies in regional governance. As in Europe, advancing a “social agenda” has often been undermined by the task of removing barriers to trade. However, while Europe saw efforts to build practices of social inclusion become institutionalized in the open method of coordination (OMC) in the 1990s (Scharpf, 2007), Latin America is now experiencing a “social turn” where regional cooperation is reconnecting with social policy-making beyond a rhetorical aspect (Grugel, 2005). This chapter analyses the place of social policy as a driver of current dynamics (re)defining region-building in South America.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2014
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 363024
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/363024
ISBN: 978-1-4094-6959-9
PURE UUID: 91bb5a01-d1a0-4e0c-a57f-460176a6a0bc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Mar 2014 11:01
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics