The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Psychometric properties of three functional mobility tests for people with Parkinson Disease

Psychometric properties of three functional mobility tests for people with Parkinson Disease
Psychometric properties of three functional mobility tests for people with Parkinson Disease
Background

Standardized outcome measures with high clinical utility are of paramount importance for clinical practice.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine interrater and intrarater reliability, construct validity, discriminant ability, and smallest detectable differences of the sit-to-stand test (STS), Timed “Up & Go” Test (TUG), and bed mobility test for people with Parkinson disease (PD).

Design

A cross-sectional, psychometric evaluation study was conducted.

Methods

A group of individuals with PD (PD group) and a group of individuals who were healthy (control group) were recruited through local PD groups and assessed in a movement laboratory in their “on” phase. Measurements of time to perform one STS, TUG, and bed mobility test were collected based on video recordings of that single performance.

Results

Thirty-eight individuals with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages I–IV) and 19 age-matched control participants were recruited. Intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater and intrarater reliability for the PD group ranged from .95 to .99. Bland-Altman plots showed mean differences close to zero and narrow confidence intervals. Construct validity was established by means of moderate to good Spearman rho correlation coefficients with part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and the Hoehn and Yahr stage (range=.51–.63). Timings of all tests discriminated participants in the PD group from those in the control group and participants in the PD group in Hoehn and Yahr stages I and II from those in Hoehn and Yahr stages III and IV but did not discriminate “nonfallers” or those with single falls from repeat “fallers” or “nonfreezers” from “freezers.” Applicable smallest detectable differences were established.

Limitations

The results are not generalizable to people in the late stage of PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage IV: n=3).

Conclusions

Timings of video recordings of 3 functional mobility tests with high clinical utility showed good psychometric properties for community-dwelling, ambulatory people with PD.
0031-9023
230-239
Verheyden, G.
dd0095fa-83d8-4ffd-af2f-fcef6f8a3997
Kampshoff, C.S.
3c3d0664-9b40-48bd-892d-46c847e32b08
Burnett, M.
2c3baa00-d368-4ce7-8a8b-822ea7ebe475
Cashell, J
8744732e-6617-407a-8b05-939ba9fccb70
Martinelli, L
a001449c-40de-4338-8484-abe61db6f961
Nicholas, A
13c8b3f9-f9cc-415b-bf64-9695cc6ceb96
Stack, E.L.
44f18178-b8d9-4f1a-acb3-ff8139cd4244
Ashburn, A.
818b9ce8-f025-429e-9532-43ee4fd5f991
Verheyden, G.
dd0095fa-83d8-4ffd-af2f-fcef6f8a3997
Kampshoff, C.S.
3c3d0664-9b40-48bd-892d-46c847e32b08
Burnett, M.
2c3baa00-d368-4ce7-8a8b-822ea7ebe475
Cashell, J
8744732e-6617-407a-8b05-939ba9fccb70
Martinelli, L
a001449c-40de-4338-8484-abe61db6f961
Nicholas, A
13c8b3f9-f9cc-415b-bf64-9695cc6ceb96
Stack, E.L.
44f18178-b8d9-4f1a-acb3-ff8139cd4244
Ashburn, A.
818b9ce8-f025-429e-9532-43ee4fd5f991

Verheyden, G., Kampshoff, C.S., Burnett, M., Cashell, J, Martinelli, L, Nicholas, A, Stack, E.L. and Ashburn, A. (2014) Psychometric properties of three functional mobility tests for people with Parkinson Disease. Physical Therapy, 94 (2), 230-239. (doi:10.2522/ptj.20130141).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

Standardized outcome measures with high clinical utility are of paramount importance for clinical practice.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine interrater and intrarater reliability, construct validity, discriminant ability, and smallest detectable differences of the sit-to-stand test (STS), Timed “Up & Go” Test (TUG), and bed mobility test for people with Parkinson disease (PD).

Design

A cross-sectional, psychometric evaluation study was conducted.

Methods

A group of individuals with PD (PD group) and a group of individuals who were healthy (control group) were recruited through local PD groups and assessed in a movement laboratory in their “on” phase. Measurements of time to perform one STS, TUG, and bed mobility test were collected based on video recordings of that single performance.

Results

Thirty-eight individuals with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages I–IV) and 19 age-matched control participants were recruited. Intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater and intrarater reliability for the PD group ranged from .95 to .99. Bland-Altman plots showed mean differences close to zero and narrow confidence intervals. Construct validity was established by means of moderate to good Spearman rho correlation coefficients with part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and the Hoehn and Yahr stage (range=.51–.63). Timings of all tests discriminated participants in the PD group from those in the control group and participants in the PD group in Hoehn and Yahr stages I and II from those in Hoehn and Yahr stages III and IV but did not discriminate “nonfallers” or those with single falls from repeat “fallers” or “nonfreezers” from “freezers.” Applicable smallest detectable differences were established.

Limitations

The results are not generalizable to people in the late stage of PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage IV: n=3).

Conclusions

Timings of video recordings of 3 functional mobility tests with high clinical utility showed good psychometric properties for community-dwelling, ambulatory people with PD.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 14 November 2013
Published date: February 2014
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 364874
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/364874
ISSN: 0031-9023
PURE UUID: b0398765-af62-45ef-a2d1-8e9da85ca72f
ORCID for M. Burnett: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5481-4398

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 May 2014 10:47
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G. Verheyden
Author: C.S. Kampshoff
Author: M. Burnett ORCID iD
Author: J Cashell
Author: L Martinelli
Author: A Nicholas
Author: E.L. Stack
Author: A. Ashburn

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×