The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Educational effectiveness improvement research policy and practice: the rise of performance-based reform

Educational effectiveness improvement research policy and practice: the rise of performance-based reform
Educational effectiveness improvement research policy and practice: the rise of performance-based reform
Systems of educational organisation are run in three ways (Anderson, 2005):

• Through ‘regulatory’ responsibility to rules, regulations etc. (what can be called ‘administrative accountability’);
• Through adherence to ‘professional’ norms, values and standards (‘professional accountability’);
• Through ‘results driven’ accountability related to the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational system in generating desired outcomes (‘performance’ or ‘outcome accountability’).

The first method demands compliance with rules, regulations and laws – current procedures about child protection are an example of this, as are the current Inspection Frameworks (albeit differently administered in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland). The second method specifies the professional conduct, behaviour and processes expected from groups of professionals – the ‘Association of Educational Psychologists Code of Conduct’ is an example of this kind of accountability. And the third method attempts to take performance data about how well educational systems and schools individually have been doing into the society outside schools and colleges in order to give information to government, parents and the general public, which they will then use to inform their decisions about education.

The direction of travel over the last 30 years, internationally, has been strongly of the third type - performance based reforms - using the ‘demand’ side of education as a lever of improvement through parents choosing what they see as more appropriate schools for their children, and monitoring the performance of these schools and the education system more generally. Performance based reform has also been linked to the supply side of education directly – to the actions and operation of the national and local ‘states’ that run public education. This latter model is therefore one of simultaneous ‘supply-side/demand-side’ reform, and of ‘supply-side/demand-side’ accountability, and has become increasingly influential across the world’s educational systems over time. It is also closely related to the emergence and findings of EER.
educational effectiveness, school improvement, policy research, performance-based reform
283-309
Routledge
Reynolds, David
7761a0ea-0758-4410-8ce0-048db979902e
Kelly, Anthony
1facbd39-0f75-49ee-9d58-d56b74c6debd
Chapman, Christopher
977cfce0-6a40-4ede-8cab-29fb44d03582
Reynolds, David
7761a0ea-0758-4410-8ce0-048db979902e
Kelly, Anthony
1facbd39-0f75-49ee-9d58-d56b74c6debd
Chapman, Christopher
977cfce0-6a40-4ede-8cab-29fb44d03582

Reynolds, David, Kelly, Anthony and Chapman, Christopher (2015) Educational effectiveness improvement research policy and practice: the rise of performance-based reform. In, The International Handbook of Educational Effectiveness: Research, Policy and Practice. Abingdon, GB. Routledge, pp. 283-309.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Systems of educational organisation are run in three ways (Anderson, 2005):

• Through ‘regulatory’ responsibility to rules, regulations etc. (what can be called ‘administrative accountability’);
• Through adherence to ‘professional’ norms, values and standards (‘professional accountability’);
• Through ‘results driven’ accountability related to the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational system in generating desired outcomes (‘performance’ or ‘outcome accountability’).

The first method demands compliance with rules, regulations and laws – current procedures about child protection are an example of this, as are the current Inspection Frameworks (albeit differently administered in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland). The second method specifies the professional conduct, behaviour and processes expected from groups of professionals – the ‘Association of Educational Psychologists Code of Conduct’ is an example of this kind of accountability. And the third method attempts to take performance data about how well educational systems and schools individually have been doing into the society outside schools and colleges in order to give information to government, parents and the general public, which they will then use to inform their decisions about education.

The direction of travel over the last 30 years, internationally, has been strongly of the third type - performance based reforms - using the ‘demand’ side of education as a lever of improvement through parents choosing what they see as more appropriate schools for their children, and monitoring the performance of these schools and the education system more generally. Performance based reform has also been linked to the supply side of education directly – to the actions and operation of the national and local ‘states’ that run public education. This latter model is therefore one of simultaneous ‘supply-side/demand-side’ reform, and of ‘supply-side/demand-side’ accountability, and has become increasingly influential across the world’s educational systems over time. It is also closely related to the emergence and findings of EER.

Text
Chapter_RisePerf_basedReforms.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (516kB)
Request a copy

More information

Published date: December 2015
Keywords: educational effectiveness, school improvement, policy research, performance-based reform

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365022
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365022
PURE UUID: a1f6dd2c-9ac8-4885-9209-91a012376c3f
ORCID for Anthony Kelly: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-8585

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 May 2014 16:03
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:14

Export record

Contributors

Author: David Reynolds
Author: Anthony Kelly ORCID iD
Author: Christopher Chapman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×