The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The engines of gravity-driven movement on passive margins: quantifying the relative contribution of spreading vs. gravity sliding mechanisms

The engines of gravity-driven movement on passive margins: quantifying the relative contribution of spreading vs. gravity sliding mechanisms
The engines of gravity-driven movement on passive margins: quantifying the relative contribution of spreading vs. gravity sliding mechanisms
Movement of gravity-driven systems on passive margins is fuelled by the loss of gravitational potential energy. Two end-member modes (gravity spreading and gravity gliding) are defined by whether the potential energy loss is due to deformation and movement towards the base of the system (spreading), or by movement parallel to the base of the system (gliding); most natural systems consist of a mixture of the two processes.

Hitherto, use of these concepts has been limited or equivocal due to lack of a quantitative measure. In some cases, characterisation of gliding vs. spreading systems based on secondary attributes has resulted in controversy, because there is a lack of consensus as to which of these are truly diagnostic. This paper presents a new, simple quantitative method based on vector analysis, providing a numerical measure of the relative contribution of spreading vs. gliding. The method is applied to synthetic examples, where deformation can be tracked, and to natural examples where a valid palinspastic reconstruction is available. The results confirm that most natural examples exhibit mixed-mode behaviour, and that some have been mischaracterized; much of the Angola margin is dominated by spreading. The method can also provide an estimate of the absolute amount of gravitational potential energy released in the movement, and the energy contribution made by gliding vs. spreading. Determining the dominant process has implications for predicting the development of seafloor topography and stratal architecture.
Gravity tectonics, gravity spreading, gravity gliding, Passive margin deformation, Angola, Orange Basin
0040-1951
126-142
Peel, Frank J.
ccbb86f8-56a0-4b59-b664-e772a9c4015f
Peel, Frank J.
ccbb86f8-56a0-4b59-b664-e772a9c4015f

Peel, Frank J. (2014) The engines of gravity-driven movement on passive margins: quantifying the relative contribution of spreading vs. gravity sliding mechanisms. Tectonophysics, 633, 126-142. (doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.023).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Movement of gravity-driven systems on passive margins is fuelled by the loss of gravitational potential energy. Two end-member modes (gravity spreading and gravity gliding) are defined by whether the potential energy loss is due to deformation and movement towards the base of the system (spreading), or by movement parallel to the base of the system (gliding); most natural systems consist of a mixture of the two processes.

Hitherto, use of these concepts has been limited or equivocal due to lack of a quantitative measure. In some cases, characterisation of gliding vs. spreading systems based on secondary attributes has resulted in controversy, because there is a lack of consensus as to which of these are truly diagnostic. This paper presents a new, simple quantitative method based on vector analysis, providing a numerical measure of the relative contribution of spreading vs. gliding. The method is applied to synthetic examples, where deformation can be tracked, and to natural examples where a valid palinspastic reconstruction is available. The results confirm that most natural examples exhibit mixed-mode behaviour, and that some have been mischaracterized; much of the Angola margin is dominated by spreading. The method can also provide an estimate of the absolute amount of gravitational potential energy released in the movement, and the energy contribution made by gliding vs. spreading. Determining the dominant process has implications for predicting the development of seafloor topography and stratal architecture.

Text
1-s2.0-S0040195114003497-main_Peel.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 May 2014
Published date: October 2014
Keywords: Gravity tectonics, gravity spreading, gravity gliding, Passive margin deformation, Angola, Orange Basin
Organisations: Marine Geoscience

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365284
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365284
ISSN: 0040-1951
PURE UUID: 7059582c-b9ea-4597-ab48-50aa67ce6357

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 May 2014 09:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Frank J. Peel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×