The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How do salt withdrawal minibasins form? Insights from forward modelling, and implications for hydrocarbon migration

How do salt withdrawal minibasins form? Insights from forward modelling, and implications for hydrocarbon migration
How do salt withdrawal minibasins form? Insights from forward modelling, and implications for hydrocarbon migration
Existing models for the initiation of salt withdrawal minibasins focus on the role of triggers that exist within the minibasin, either stratigraphic (e.g. differential deposition) or tectonic (extension, translation or contraction). Existing studies tend to focus on complex settings, such as continental margins, which contain many different potential triggering mechanisms. It can be difficult in these settings to identify which process is responsible for minibasin initiation, or the influence of individual factors on their subsequent development. Salt withdrawal minibasins also exist in simpler settings, without any obvious intrinsic trigger; the region of the North German Basin used by Trusheim (1960) in the classic definition of salt withdrawal geometries was of this nature. There is no overall basal or surface slope, no major lateral movement, and there is no depositional heterogeneity. Previously recognized trigger processes for minibasin initiation do not apply in this benign setting, suggesting that other, potentially more fundamental, influences may be at work. A simple forward-modelling approach shows how, in the absence of any other mechanism, a new minibasin can develop as the consequence of salt movement driven by its neighbour, and families of withdrawal minibasins can propagate across a region from a single seed point. This new mechanism may explain how some minibasins appear to initiate before the sediment density has exceeded that of the underlying salt. The forward modelling also indicates that some minibasins begin to invert to form turtle anticlines before the underlying salt has been evacuated, so that the timing of turtle formation may not be diagnostic of weld formation. This mechanism may also give rise to salt-cored turtles that have a lens of salt trapped beneath their cores. These new findings have implications for hydrocarbon migration and trapping.
Salt tectonics, Salt withdrawal basins, Forward modelling, Hydrocarbon migration, Stratal architecture, Diapirs
0040-1951
222-235
Peel, Frank J.
ccbb86f8-56a0-4b59-b664-e772a9c4015f
Peel, Frank J.
ccbb86f8-56a0-4b59-b664-e772a9c4015f

Peel, Frank J. (2014) How do salt withdrawal minibasins form? Insights from forward modelling, and implications for hydrocarbon migration. Tectonophysics, 630, 222-235. (doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2014.05.027).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Existing models for the initiation of salt withdrawal minibasins focus on the role of triggers that exist within the minibasin, either stratigraphic (e.g. differential deposition) or tectonic (extension, translation or contraction). Existing studies tend to focus on complex settings, such as continental margins, which contain many different potential triggering mechanisms. It can be difficult in these settings to identify which process is responsible for minibasin initiation, or the influence of individual factors on their subsequent development. Salt withdrawal minibasins also exist in simpler settings, without any obvious intrinsic trigger; the region of the North German Basin used by Trusheim (1960) in the classic definition of salt withdrawal geometries was of this nature. There is no overall basal or surface slope, no major lateral movement, and there is no depositional heterogeneity. Previously recognized trigger processes for minibasin initiation do not apply in this benign setting, suggesting that other, potentially more fundamental, influences may be at work. A simple forward-modelling approach shows how, in the absence of any other mechanism, a new minibasin can develop as the consequence of salt movement driven by its neighbour, and families of withdrawal minibasins can propagate across a region from a single seed point. This new mechanism may explain how some minibasins appear to initiate before the sediment density has exceeded that of the underlying salt. The forward modelling also indicates that some minibasins begin to invert to form turtle anticlines before the underlying salt has been evacuated, so that the timing of turtle formation may not be diagnostic of weld formation. This mechanism may also give rise to salt-cored turtles that have a lens of salt trapped beneath their cores. These new findings have implications for hydrocarbon migration and trapping.

Text
1-s2.0-S004019511400300X-main.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: May 2014
Published date: 3 September 2014
Keywords: Salt tectonics, Salt withdrawal basins, Forward modelling, Hydrocarbon migration, Stratal architecture, Diapirs
Organisations: Marine Geoscience

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365285
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365285
ISSN: 0040-1951
PURE UUID: 83bc2145-a5da-49ac-b3cf-050a1739dee5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 May 2014 09:31
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Frank J. Peel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×