No recovery without reform? An evaluation of the evidence in support of the structural reform argument in Japan
No recovery without reform? An evaluation of the evidence in support of the structural reform argument in Japan
Conventional wisdom among many economists, central bankers, financial journalists and politicians holds that Japan must implement ‘badly needed structural reforms’ (to quote from the Financial Times). ‘No recovery without structural reform’, proclaims Prime Minister Koizumi. Japan's case is also used to advance similar reforms in other countries and regions, such as Germany, where they have already become a main plank of the government's policies. Given this overwhelming consensus, it is tempting to assume that the structural reform theory has been thoroughly subjected to empirical tests and found to be clearly supported. However, such empirical examination has so far been lacking. This paper analyses the empirical record and tests the neo-classical theories on which the structural reform case rests. It comes to the surprising finding that there is no factual support for the structural reform argument. Supply-side factors were not responsible for Japan's recession. An alternative demand-side explanation, focusing on credit creation, is found supported by the evidence.
7-38
Werner, R.A.
dc217378-eb19-4592-9be4-ab5f847b74a1
2004
Werner, R.A.
dc217378-eb19-4592-9be4-ab5f847b74a1
Werner, R.A.
(2004)
No recovery without reform? An evaluation of the evidence in support of the structural reform argument in Japan.
Asian Business and Management, 3 (1), .
(doi:10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200077).
Abstract
Conventional wisdom among many economists, central bankers, financial journalists and politicians holds that Japan must implement ‘badly needed structural reforms’ (to quote from the Financial Times). ‘No recovery without structural reform’, proclaims Prime Minister Koizumi. Japan's case is also used to advance similar reforms in other countries and regions, such as Germany, where they have already become a main plank of the government's policies. Given this overwhelming consensus, it is tempting to assume that the structural reform theory has been thoroughly subjected to empirical tests and found to be clearly supported. However, such empirical examination has so far been lacking. This paper analyses the empirical record and tests the neo-classical theories on which the structural reform case rests. It comes to the surprising finding that there is no factual support for the structural reform argument. Supply-side factors were not responsible for Japan's recession. An alternative demand-side explanation, focusing on credit creation, is found supported by the evidence.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 36542
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36542
ISSN: 1472-4782
PURE UUID: 865046bc-7223-4314-9dd6-16bc7f0b5534
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R.A. Werner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics