The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

No recovery without reform? An evaluation of the evidence in support of the structural reform argument in Japan

No recovery without reform? An evaluation of the evidence in support of the structural reform argument in Japan
No recovery without reform? An evaluation of the evidence in support of the structural reform argument in Japan
Conventional wisdom among many economists, central bankers, financial journalists and politicians holds that Japan must implement ‘badly needed structural reforms’ (to quote from the Financial Times). ‘No recovery without structural reform’, proclaims Prime Minister Koizumi. Japan's case is also used to advance similar reforms in other countries and regions, such as Germany, where they have already become a main plank of the government's policies. Given this overwhelming consensus, it is tempting to assume that the structural reform theory has been thoroughly subjected to empirical tests and found to be clearly supported. However, such empirical examination has so far been lacking. This paper analyses the empirical record and tests the neo-classical theories on which the structural reform case rests. It comes to the surprising finding that there is no factual support for the structural reform argument. Supply-side factors were not responsible for Japan's recession. An alternative demand-side explanation, focusing on credit creation, is found supported by the evidence.
1472-4782
7-38
Werner, R.A.
dc217378-eb19-4592-9be4-ab5f847b74a1
Werner, R.A.
dc217378-eb19-4592-9be4-ab5f847b74a1

Werner, R.A. (2004) No recovery without reform? An evaluation of the evidence in support of the structural reform argument in Japan. Asian Business and Management, 3 (1), 7-38. (doi:10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200077).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Conventional wisdom among many economists, central bankers, financial journalists and politicians holds that Japan must implement ‘badly needed structural reforms’ (to quote from the Financial Times). ‘No recovery without structural reform’, proclaims Prime Minister Koizumi. Japan's case is also used to advance similar reforms in other countries and regions, such as Germany, where they have already become a main plank of the government's policies. Given this overwhelming consensus, it is tempting to assume that the structural reform theory has been thoroughly subjected to empirical tests and found to be clearly supported. However, such empirical examination has so far been lacking. This paper analyses the empirical record and tests the neo-classical theories on which the structural reform case rests. It comes to the surprising finding that there is no factual support for the structural reform argument. Supply-side factors were not responsible for Japan's recession. An alternative demand-side explanation, focusing on credit creation, is found supported by the evidence.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 36542
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36542
ISSN: 1472-4782
PURE UUID: 865046bc-7223-4314-9dd6-16bc7f0b5534

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R.A. Werner

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×