The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Wilful, reckless and uninsurable?

Wilful, reckless and uninsurable?
Wilful, reckless and uninsurable?
Was it wilful? Was it misconduct? The recent Canadian Supreme Court Decision in Peracomo Inc and Others v TELUS Communications Co and Others (The Realice) restores order on the limitation issue: the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision to break limitation on the basis that Mr Vallée had not had the requisite intent to cause the damage that resulted (“recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would probably result”). In that part, the decision is probably uncontroversial – it has proven notoriously difficult to break the limitation. More interesting is the discussion of section 53(2)(a) of the Marine Insurance Act 1993,1 where the majority of four held that the conduct had not amounted to wilful misconduct, but one of the judges dissented
1471-9614
3-4
Hjalmarsson, Johanna
73a98539-9a14-4e63-bb53-5a7c365ad6e4
Hjalmarsson, Johanna
73a98539-9a14-4e63-bb53-5a7c365ad6e4

Hjalmarsson, Johanna (2014) Wilful, reckless and uninsurable? Shipping & Trade Law, 14 (5), 3-4. (Submitted)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Was it wilful? Was it misconduct? The recent Canadian Supreme Court Decision in Peracomo Inc and Others v TELUS Communications Co and Others (The Realice) restores order on the limitation issue: the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision to break limitation on the basis that Mr Vallée had not had the requisite intent to cause the damage that resulted (“recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would probably result”). In that part, the decision is probably uncontroversial – it has proven notoriously difficult to break the limitation. More interesting is the discussion of section 53(2)(a) of the Marine Insurance Act 1993,1 where the majority of four held that the conduct had not amounted to wilful misconduct, but one of the judges dissented

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Submitted date: 1 June 2014
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365492
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365492
ISSN: 1471-9614
PURE UUID: ab921e27-d411-4d1f-b746-33646ee073af
ORCID for Johanna Hjalmarsson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-811X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jun 2014 15:37
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:53

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×