Prone versus supine positioning for whole and partial breast radiotherapy: a comparison of non-target tissue dosimetry
Prone versus supine positioning for whole and partial breast radiotherapy: a comparison of non-target tissue dosimetry
Purpose: to compare non-target tissue (including left-anterior-descending coronary-artery (LAD)) dosimetry of prone versus supine whole (WBI) and partial-breast irradiation (PBI).
Methods and materials: sixty-five post-lumpectomy breast cancer patients underwent CT-imaging supine and prone. On each dataset, the whole-breast clinical-target-volume (WB-CTV), partial-breast CTV (tumour-bed + 15 mm), ipsilateral-lung and chest-wall were outlined. Heart and LAD were outlined in left-sided cases (n = 30). Tangential-field WBI and PBI plans were generated for each position. Mean LAD, heart, and ipsilateral-lung doses (xmean), maximum LAD (LADmax) doses, and the volume of chest-wall receiving 50 Gy (V50Gy) were compared.
Results: two-hundred and sixty plans were generated. Prone positioning reduced heart and LAD doses in 19/30 WBI cases (median reduction in LADmean = 6.2 Gy) and 7/30 PBI cases (median reduction in LADmax = 29.3 Gy) (no difference in 4/30 cases). However, prone positioning increased cardiac doses in 8/30 WBI (median increase in LADmean = 9.5 Gy) and 19/30 PBI cases (median increase in LADmax = 22.9 Gy) (no difference in 3/30 cases). WB-CTV > 1000cm3 was associated with improved cardiac dosimetry in the prone position for WBI (p = 0.04) and PBI (p = 0.04). Prone positioning reduced ipsilateral-lungmean in 65/65 WBI and 61/65 PBI cases, and chest-wall V50Gy in all WBI cases. PBI reduced normal-tissue doses compared to WBI in all cases, regardless of the treatment position.
Conclusions: in the context of tangential-field WBI and PBI, prone positioning is likely to benefit left-breast-affected women of larger breast volume, but to be detrimental in left-breast-affected women of smaller breast volume. Right-breast-affected women are likely to benefit from prone positioning regardless of breast volume
178-184
Kirby, A.M.
553f52fa-b7a1-4d97-8b0b-dffbd35a6b33
Evans, P.M.
59193ce5-2b34-4e1f-b586-21451818051f
Donovan, E.M.
2f2248fe-7d3f-436f-8814-25fdd7936242
Convery, H.M.
e63b663d-3890-4030-985f-0e0a7e5266e6
Haviland, J.S.
569aa43b-15bd-4e9d-b4a5-e68a84334cfe
Yarnold, J.S.
203df2bd-0063-4d27-9d9a-3aae1a34b5bf
August 2010
Kirby, A.M.
553f52fa-b7a1-4d97-8b0b-dffbd35a6b33
Evans, P.M.
59193ce5-2b34-4e1f-b586-21451818051f
Donovan, E.M.
2f2248fe-7d3f-436f-8814-25fdd7936242
Convery, H.M.
e63b663d-3890-4030-985f-0e0a7e5266e6
Haviland, J.S.
569aa43b-15bd-4e9d-b4a5-e68a84334cfe
Yarnold, J.S.
203df2bd-0063-4d27-9d9a-3aae1a34b5bf
Kirby, A.M., Evans, P.M., Donovan, E.M., Convery, H.M., Haviland, J.S. and Yarnold, J.S.
(2010)
Prone versus supine positioning for whole and partial breast radiotherapy: a comparison of non-target tissue dosimetry.
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 96 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.05.014).
Abstract
Purpose: to compare non-target tissue (including left-anterior-descending coronary-artery (LAD)) dosimetry of prone versus supine whole (WBI) and partial-breast irradiation (PBI).
Methods and materials: sixty-five post-lumpectomy breast cancer patients underwent CT-imaging supine and prone. On each dataset, the whole-breast clinical-target-volume (WB-CTV), partial-breast CTV (tumour-bed + 15 mm), ipsilateral-lung and chest-wall were outlined. Heart and LAD were outlined in left-sided cases (n = 30). Tangential-field WBI and PBI plans were generated for each position. Mean LAD, heart, and ipsilateral-lung doses (xmean), maximum LAD (LADmax) doses, and the volume of chest-wall receiving 50 Gy (V50Gy) were compared.
Results: two-hundred and sixty plans were generated. Prone positioning reduced heart and LAD doses in 19/30 WBI cases (median reduction in LADmean = 6.2 Gy) and 7/30 PBI cases (median reduction in LADmax = 29.3 Gy) (no difference in 4/30 cases). However, prone positioning increased cardiac doses in 8/30 WBI (median increase in LADmean = 9.5 Gy) and 19/30 PBI cases (median increase in LADmax = 22.9 Gy) (no difference in 3/30 cases). WB-CTV > 1000cm3 was associated with improved cardiac dosimetry in the prone position for WBI (p = 0.04) and PBI (p = 0.04). Prone positioning reduced ipsilateral-lungmean in 65/65 WBI and 61/65 PBI cases, and chest-wall V50Gy in all WBI cases. PBI reduced normal-tissue doses compared to WBI in all cases, regardless of the treatment position.
Conclusions: in the context of tangential-field WBI and PBI, prone positioning is likely to benefit left-breast-affected women of larger breast volume, but to be detrimental in left-breast-affected women of smaller breast volume. Right-breast-affected women are likely to benefit from prone positioning regardless of breast volume
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: August 2010
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 365589
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365589
ISSN: 0167-8140
PURE UUID: e49335f1-6088-404c-bbe4-907aef1d7c75
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jun 2014 09:17
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.M. Kirby
Author:
P.M. Evans
Author:
E.M. Donovan
Author:
H.M. Convery
Author:
J.S. Haviland
Author:
J.S. Yarnold
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics